Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

has been recognized

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"has been recognized" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when the speaker is referencing an action that has already been accepted or acknowledged. For example: "His work on the project has been recognized by the board of directors."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Gonorrhea has been recognized since antiquity.

News & Media

The New Yorker

That, Dr. Taubenberger says, "has been recognized for 150 years".

This achievement has been recognized three times this year.

The voluntary curfew has been recognized for 20 years.

News & Media

The New York Times

He has been recognized in other ways, too.

News & Media

The New Yorker

That fact has been recognized by the thieves.

News & Media

The New York Times

"This has been recognized by Glencore and its partners".

News & Media

The New York Times

The success of the aircraft has been recognized globally.

News & Media

The New York Times

The academy's success has been recognized.

Science & Research

Science Magazine

Biomass has been recognized as a sustainable energy source.

This has been recognized previously as well [6, 36, 37].

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has been recognized" when you want to emphasize that something has achieved a certain level of acceptance, approval, or understanding within a specific field or among a group of people.

Common error

Avoid overusing "has been recognized" in contexts where active voice would be more direct and impactful. For instance, instead of "The committee's efforts have been recognized by the CEO", consider "The CEO recognized the committee's efforts."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.4/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been recognized" functions as a passive construction of the verb "recognize", indicating that a subject has received acknowledgement, approval, or validation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase. Examples show it used across diverse fields from science to media.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has been recognized" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It functions to indicate that something has gained acceptance, approval, or understanding, particularly in academic, scientific, and news contexts. While versatile, be mindful of overusing passive voice and consider whether an active construction would be more impactful. Numerous examples across various sources demonstrate its broad applicability. Related phrases like "has been acknowledged" and "has gained acceptance" offer alternative ways to express similar ideas.

FAQs

How can I use "has been recognized" in a sentence?

Use "has been recognized" to indicate that something has gained acceptance or acknowledgment. For example, "The importance of early childhood education "has been recognized" by policymakers".

What are some alternatives to "has been recognized"?

Alternatives include "has been acknowledged", "has been identified", or "has gained acceptance", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "has been recognized"?

While "has been recognized" is passive, it's appropriate when the focus is on the thing being recognized rather than the actor. If the actor is important, use the active voice, e.g., "Experts recognize...".

What's the difference between "has been recognized" and "was recognized"?

"Has been recognized" implies recognition continuing to the present, whereas "was recognized" refers to a recognition that occurred and concluded in the past. For example, "Her contributions "has been recognized", and she continues to receive awards" versus "Her work "was recognized" at the time, but has since been forgotten".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.4/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: