hard to include

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "hard to include" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that is difficult to incorporate or integrate into a larger context or system. Example: "The new policy changes are hard to include in the existing framework without causing confusion."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

43 human-written examples

Too long, too many parts to it, very hard to include in any sentence.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

It would not be hard to include since Tate Britain owns it.

The Guardian - Arts

It's hard to include every work that represents this from 2016.

The Guardian

(When you are telling a false story, it's hard to include the things you did not see or think about).

The New York Times

In any country it's hard to include people who were left out in the past during a rapidly changing economy".

The New York Times

Making the child credit available to low-income families was a provision that moderates in both parties fought hard to include in the bill.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

15 human-written examples

This made it harder to include them later on, even as more helicopters arrived.

The New Yorker

Many have criticized President Obama for not having fought harder to include it in the Affordable Care Act.

The New York Times

It's easy to offend people; it's harder to include them in comedy and not to compromise on the subject matter.

The Guardian

I never believed we should exclude [LGBT Christians], but not until now have I believed we need to be working harder to include them".

The Guardian

And yet, precisely because of this background, Jean Ashton, the exhibition's curator and the museum's senior director for resources and programs, should have worked harder to include the insight of those already active in chronicling AIDS and its legacy.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "hard to include", ensure that the reason for the difficulty is clear from the context. Providing this clarity enhances the reader's understanding and the impact of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "hard to include" as a vague statement without specifying what makes the inclusion difficult. Be specific about the challenges or obstacles involved.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "hard to include" functions as an adjective phrase modifying an implied noun, often referring to an item, concept, or group. It expresses the difficulty associated with incorporating that entity into a larger context. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "hard to include" is a grammatically correct and versatile phrase used to describe the difficulty of incorporating something. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It's commonly found in news and media, as well as scientific contexts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the reason for the difficulty. Alternatives such as "difficult to incorporate" or "challenging to integrate" can add nuance or formality depending on the situation. The key is to provide context and specify the challenges involved.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

difficult to incorporate

Replaces "hard" with "difficult", maintaining the core meaning of something being not easy to integrate.

challenging to integrate

Uses "challenging" instead of "hard", suggesting a demanding but potentially rewarding integration process.

not easily incorporated

Emphasizes the lack of ease in the inclusion process, highlighting potential obstacles.

presents difficulties for inclusion

Shifts the focus to the difficulties that the inclusion process presents.

poses an inclusion challenge

Highlights the challenge aspect, framing the integration as a problem to be solved.

integration is problematic

States directly that the act of integrating is causing problems.

inclusion is a struggle

Expresses the difficulty as a continuous effort or fight to include something.

encounters resistance to inclusion

Focuses on the resistance met when trying to include something, implying external forces.

faces obstacles to integration

Highlights the presence of obstacles that hinder the integration process.

integration proves troublesome

Indicates that the act of integrating is causing trouble or annoyance.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "hard to include" to sound more formal?

Consider using phrases like "difficult to incorporate", "challenging to integrate", or "not easily incorporated" in more formal contexts.

What are some common reasons why something might be "hard to include"?

Reasons can vary widely, from practical limitations (e.g., data scarcity) to theoretical incompatibilities or logistical problems in implementation.

Is it ever appropriate to use "difficult to exclude" instead of "hard to include"?

Yes, depending on the context. If the focus is on preventing exclusion rather than promoting inclusion, "difficult to exclude" may be more appropriate, as it highlights the challenges of leaving something out.

When should I use "hard to include" versus "harder to include"?

"Hard to include" describes a general difficulty, while "harder to include" implies a comparative difficulty, suggesting it's more challenging than something else. Choose the form that accurately reflects the situation.