had been omitted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had been omitted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was left out or not included in a previous context or document. Example: "The important details had been omitted from the final report, leading to confusion among the team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Others said facts, issues or alternative views had been omitted.

The Guardian

from London, although Cora had been omitted in his will.

The New Yorker

Lampard had been omitted from the first leg in Naples.

The New York Times - Sports

Prior to this repeal, they had been omitted in view of the independence of the Philippines.

Cornell University

This article was amended on 8 February to include a Defra comment which had been omitted.

The Guardian

He was 32, and had been omitted from the squads in both 1978 and 1982.

The Guardian - Sport

One historical discrepancy was that his own character had been omitted from the narrative.

The New Yorker

Takeshima had been omitted, along with thousands of other tiny islands.

The Guardian

Rudy Gestede had been omitted against Wigan after Crystal Palace bid for him.

The Guardian - Sport

We requested some pickled ginger, which had been omitted, but it never arrived.

The New York Times

And its release indicated that some words had been omitted even from that paragraph.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using active voice alternatives like "they omitted" if appropriate for a more direct and concise style.

Common error

Avoid using "had been omitted" excessively in situations where the actor is known and relevant. Replacing it with an active voice construction can make your writing more dynamic and engaging.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had been omitted" functions as a passive perfect construction, indicating that something was left out or excluded at some point in the past before another point in the past. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

35%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "had been omitted" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive perfect construction. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for conveying that something was left out or excluded. While versatile, considering active voice alternatives can enhance writing dynamism. It appears most frequently in "News & Media" and "Science" contexts, suggesting a neutral to formal register. Remember to ensure clarity about what was omitted and why it matters for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not included

Replaces the passive perfect with a simpler passive construction.

was excluded

Focuses on the act of exclusion rather than the state of being left out.

was left out

A more informal and direct way of saying something was not included.

was not present

Highlights the absence of something that was expected.

was not incorporated

Emphasizes the lack of integration into a whole.

had not been mentioned

Focuses on the lack of reference to something.

had been excluded from

Similar in meaning, but explicitly states the source from which something was removed.

had been disregarded

Suggests a deliberate overlooking or ignoring of something.

was not taken into account

Implies a failure to consider something relevant.

was passed over

Suggests a decision to skip or ignore something.

FAQs

How can I use "had been omitted" in a sentence?

Use "had been omitted" to indicate that something was intentionally or unintentionally left out from a previous version, list, or account. For example, "The crucial data "had been omitted" from the report."

What are some alternatives to "had been omitted"?

Alternatives include "was not included", "was excluded", "was left out", and "was not mentioned", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing something that was left out?

While "had been omitted" (passive voice) is grammatically correct, using the active voice (e.g., "they omitted") can often make your writing more direct and concise. Choose the voice that best suits your context and desired emphasis.

What is the difference between "had been omitted" and "had been excluded"?

"Had been omitted" generally implies something was unintentionally left out, while "had been excluded" suggests a deliberate act of removal. The choice depends on whether the exclusion was intentional or accidental.