Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had been found

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"had been found" is a correct and usable form of written English.
You can use it to express something that happened in the past before some other event. For example, "The lost necklace had been found just before the thief was arrested."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He denied that weapons had been found.

News & Media

The New York Times

New evidence, he said, had been found.

News & Media

Independent

He said 15 bodies had been found.

News & Media

The New York Times

In each, significant differences had been found.

News & Media

The New York Times

A fitting adversary had been found.

News & Media

The New York Times

None had been found.

News & Media

The Guardian

No survivors had been found.

News & Media

The Guardian

Black swans had been found!

News & Media

The Guardian

No body had been found.

News & Media

The New York Times

He had been found by a neighbour.

News & Media

The Guardian

A school transfer certificate had been found.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "had been found", ensure the sentence clearly specifies what was found and, if relevant, by whom or where it was found for better clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "had been found" when the context requires a simpler past tense form like "was found". The past perfect tense is best when indicating an action completed before another past action.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

92%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had been found" functions as a passive perfect construction, indicating that something was discovered or located at a point in time prior to another event in the past. As Ludwig AI points out, this construction is grammatically sound and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "had been found" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase in English, as Ludwig AI confirms. It functions as a passive perfect construction, indicating a discovery or location that occurred before another point in the past. Its neutral register makes it suitable for a wide range of contexts, including news, science, and academia. Remember to use it when you need to emphasize that a discovery preceded another past event, and avoid using it when a simple past tense would suffice. By understanding these nuances, you can effectively use "had been found" in your writing to create clarity and establish a clear sequence of events. Common errors include using the wrong tense; be sure to review tense usage to avoid this.

FAQs

How can I use "had been found" in a sentence?

Use "had been found" to describe a discovery that happened before another event in the past. For example, "The missing documents "had been found" before the investigation concluded".

What's the difference between "had been found" and "was found"?

"Had been found" indicates a past perfect passive tense, meaning the finding occurred before another point in the past. "Was found" is simple past passive, indicating the finding occurred at a specific point in the past. For example, "The key "was found" under the rug" vs. "The key "had been found" before I left the house".

What are some alternatives to "had been found"?

Alternatives include "was discovered", "was located", or "was detected", depending on the specific context you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "have been found" instead of "had been found"?

No, "have been found" is present perfect tense and implies the finding occurred at some unspecified time before now, while "had been found" is past perfect, indicating it occurred before another point in the past. They are used in different contexts.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

92%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: