grounds for thinking

USAGE SUMMARY

"grounds for thinking" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when referring to the basis for logical reasoning or opinion based on facts or evidence. For example: "This new evidence provides grounds for thinking that the accused is not guilty."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Yet there are grounds for thinking that, with luck, things may not all go his way.

The Economist

But there are grounds for thinking that the estimates may now be on the low side.

The Economist

Yet there are grounds for thinking the benefits they create are worth having.

The Economist

The government has good grounds for thinking that Trump will be met by huge protests.

The Guardian

But there are ample grounds for thinking that war against Iraq would be much tougher.

The New York Times

His bugaboo is change without strong grounds for thinking it an improvement, and social complexity deprives us of such grounds.

Independent

But there was never any grounds for thinking it amounted to anything concrete at all in policy terms.

The Washington Post

There are no good grounds for thinking that the regularity breaks down when the entities in question lie below the threshold of human observation.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Indeed, Quebec had constitutional grounds for thinking it might do so, claiming that cultural affairs were educational and therefore a provincial matter.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Judging by recent events in Iraq, it would seem as though there are good grounds for thinking that Blair has indeed refused to learn from history.

The Guardian - Books

"I did not hide from the investigation, and there are no grounds for thinking that I would hide now," he said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "grounds for thinking", ensure that you clearly articulate the specific reasons or evidence that support the thought or conclusion. This enhances the credibility and persuasiveness of your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "grounds for thinking" without providing specific supporting details. Simply stating that there are grounds without elaborating weakens your argument and leaves room for doubt. Instead, always follow up with the evidence or reasons that form the basis of your thinking.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "grounds for thinking" functions as a noun phrase that introduces the basis or justification for a particular belief, assumption, or conclusion. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in constructing arguments and explaining viewpoints across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

28%

Encyclopedias

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "grounds for thinking" is a versatile phrase used to introduce the reasons or evidence supporting a particular belief or conclusion. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage across diverse contexts, particularly in News & Media, Science, and Encyclopedias. To use it effectively, ensure that you provide clear and specific details to support your reasoning, avoiding vagueness to strengthen your argument. Alternatives include "reasons to believe" and "basis for assuming", offering nuanced ways to express the underlying logic behind your thoughts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reasons to believe

Focuses on the reasons behind a belief, emphasizing the acceptance of something as true.

justifications for believing

Highlights the act of providing reasons to defend or support a belief.

basis for assuming

Emphasizes the foundation upon which an assumption is made, suggesting a starting point for reasoning.

rationale for concluding

Focuses on the reasoning process leading to a conclusion, suggesting a more formal or analytical approach.

evidence suggesting

Highlights the presence of evidence that points towards a particular idea or outcome.

reasons for suspecting

Implies a level of doubt or uncertainty, focusing on the reasons behind a suspicion.

indicators suggesting

Emphasizes signs or clues that point towards a particular conclusion or situation.

justification for assuming

Offers a formal tone, emphasizing the defense of an assumption with logical reasons.

basis for supposing

Similar to assuming, but with a slightly more tentative or speculative connotation.

arguments supporting

Focuses on the persuasive reasons used to defend or promote an idea or viewpoint.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "grounds for thinking" in a sentence?

Use "grounds for thinking" to introduce the reasons or evidence that support a particular conclusion or belief. For example, "The increasing market share provides "grounds for thinking" the new product is successful".

What are some alternatives to "grounds for thinking" that I can use?

You can use alternatives like "reasons to believe", "basis for assuming", or "justifications for believing" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "grounds for thinking" or "reasons for thinking"?

Both "grounds for thinking" and "reasons for thinking" are correct and can be used interchangeably. The choice often depends on personal preference or the specific nuance you wish to convey. "Grounds" may imply a more solid or factual basis.

In what contexts is "grounds for thinking" most appropriate?

"Grounds for thinking" is suitable in various contexts, including academic writing, news reporting, and general discussions, where you need to provide a rationale or justification for a particular viewpoint or conclusion. It's less common in very informal settings.