reasons for thinking

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reasons for thinking" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing justifications or rationales behind a particular belief or opinion. Example: "There are several reasons for thinking that climate change is accelerating at an unprecedented rate."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Since the Mādhyamikas believe that all phenomena are empty, they owe it to their readers to provide reasons for thinking that that is a reasonable thing to believe.

SEP

There are several reasons for thinking this.

The Guardian - Opinion

But there are good reasons for thinking they are low.

Independent

But there are reasons for thinking the NSS is reliable.

The Economist

There are a lot of reasons for thinking that".

The New York Times

There are very good reasons for thinking things are OK.

The Guardian - Books

There are two connected reasons for thinking this.

The Guardian - Opinion

There are two reasons for thinking that this time it will hit the target.

The Economist

But there are at least two reasons for thinking his government's economic achievements will be modest.

The Economist

This puzzle is more clever than profound, although reasons for thinking it meaningful might be conceived.

The New York Times - Arts

There are good reasons for thinking separately about medicinal and recreational drugs.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "reasons for thinking", clearly articulate each point and provide supporting evidence to strengthen your argument. Use transitional phrases like "firstly", "secondly", and "finally" to guide your reader through the logic.

Common error

Avoid presenting opinions as definitive truths when outlining "reasons for thinking". Acknowledge potential counterarguments and frame your reasons as probabilities or informed judgments rather than absolute certainties. This enhances credibility and demonstrates balanced reasoning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reasons for thinking" primarily functions as a noun phrase, introducing the justifications or rationale behind a particular belief or opinion. Ludwig AI's analysis and the provided examples demonstrate its use in presenting arguments and supporting viewpoints.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

36%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "reasons for thinking" is a versatile phrase used to introduce justifications and rationales behind beliefs or opinions. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and widely applicable across diverse contexts, from news and media to academic and scientific discussions. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity, provide supporting evidence, and acknowledge potential counterarguments. Alternatives like "grounds for thinking" or "rationale for believing" can add nuance to your writing. Being mindful of these aspects will enhance the effectiveness and credibility of your communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

grounds for believing

Changes "reasons" to "grounds" and "thinking" to "believing", offering a slightly more formal tone.

basis for believing

Substitutes "reasons" with "basis" and "thinking" with "believing", suggesting a fundamental justification.

rationale for believing

Replaces "reasons" with "rationale", implying a more structured and logical justification.

justification for believing

Uses "justification" instead of "reasons", emphasizing the act of proving something to be right or reasonable.

evidence for concluding

Shifts from "reasons" to "evidence" and "thinking" to "concluding", highlighting the information that supports a final decision.

arguments for suggesting

Replaces "reasons" with "arguments" and "thinking" with "suggesting", focusing on persuasive points in favor of an idea.

support for assuming

Changes "reasons" to "support" and "thinking" to "assuming", indicating backing for a preliminary belief.

the case for assuming

Uses "the case" instead of "reasons" and "assuming" for "thinking", presenting a set of reasons and evidence in support of a particular conclusion or point of view.

justification for assuming

Changes only single words: "reasons" becomes "justification" and "thinking" becomes "assuming", presenting a set of reasons and evidence in support of a particular conclusion or point of view.

explanation for assuming

Substitutes "reasons" with "explanation" and "thinking" with "assuming", indicating a clarification for a preliminary belief.

FAQs

How can I use "reasons for thinking" effectively in a sentence?

Use "reasons for thinking" to introduce the justifications behind a belief or opinion. For instance: "There are compelling reasons for thinking that the economy will improve next year."

What phrases can I use instead of "reasons for thinking"?

You can use alternatives such as "grounds for thinking", "basis for believing", or "rationale for concluding" depending on the specific context.

Is there a difference between "reasons for thinking" and "reasons for believing"?

While similar, "reasons for thinking" can encompass a broader range of cognitive processes, including speculation and hypothesis, whereas "reasons for believing" typically implies a stronger degree of conviction. You may find the alternative phrases to "reasons for thinking" to be helpful /s/reasons+for+thinking.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when presenting "reasons for thinking"?

Avoid making unsubstantiated claims or presenting opinions as facts. Always provide evidence or logical arguments to support your "reasons for thinking", and acknowledge any potential counterarguments.