gross violation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "gross violation" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to refer to a serious or severe breach of rules, laws, or moral codes. Example: The company's failure to properly dispose of toxic waste was a gross violation of environmental regulations.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Anything else is a gross violation.

The New York Times

"It is a gross violation.

The Guardian

"This betrays a gross violation..

The Guardian - Sport

This is a gross violation of congressional decorum.

The New Yorker

This, of course, was a gross violation of medical ethics.

The New York Times

"This is a gross violation of the understandings," he said.

The New York Times

This was a gross violation of its legal order.

The Guardian

Such abuse is a gross violation of Jewish ethical principles.

The Guardian

It is a gross violation of medical ethics.

The Guardian - Opinion

Individual officers could not, of course, take free food, a gross violation of professional ethics.

The New York Times - Magazine

"A gross violation of our internal ethics has occurred and it will be thoroughly investigated".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "gross violation", ensure that the context clearly establishes the specific rule, law, or ethical standard that has been severely breached. Providing specific details strengthens the impact of the statement.

Common error

Avoid using "gross violation" to describe minor infractions or disagreements. This phrase carries significant weight and should be reserved for situations involving serious breaches of ethical or legal standards.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "gross violation" functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the object of a verb or preposition. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in describing serious breaches. For example, "This is a gross violation of human rights."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Formal & Business

24%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Science

16%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "gross violation" is a commonly used and grammatically correct noun phrase that signifies a serious breach of rules, laws, or ethical principles. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage spans various contexts, including news, business, and academic writing. While alternatives like "egregious violation" and "flagrant violation" exist, "gross violation" effectively conveys the severity of the transgression. When employing this phrase, ensure the context clearly identifies the breached standard to maximize its impact. Avoid overuse in minor situations to maintain its significance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

egregious violation

Focuses on the shocking or conspicuously bad nature of the violation.

flagrant violation

Highlights the blatant and obvious nature of the violation.

severe breach

Emphasizes the seriousness and impact of the violation.

serious infringement

Implies a significant breach of rules or laws.

major transgression

Suggests a significant departure from accepted standards of behavior.

grave infraction

Underscores the weighty and critical nature of the violation.

outrageous breach

Highlights the shocking and unacceptable nature of the breach.

significant dereliction

Emphasizes the neglect of duty or responsibility involved in the violation.

palpable transgression

Highlights the readily apparent nature of the transgression.

evident violation

Underscores the obvious nature of the violation.

FAQs

How to use "gross violation" in a sentence?

You can use "gross violation" to describe serious breaches of rules, laws, or ethical standards. For example: "The company's actions were a "gross violation" of consumer trust."

What can I say instead of "gross violation"?

You can use alternatives like "egregious violation", "flagrant violation", or "severe breach" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "gross violation" or "major violation"?

"Gross violation" suggests a more severe and unacceptable breach compared to "major violation", which simply indicates a significant breach. The choice depends on the severity you wish to convey.

What's the difference between "gross violation" and "minor violation"?

A ""gross violation"" is a severe and unacceptable breach of rules or laws, while a "minor violation" is a less serious infraction that may not have significant consequences. They represent opposite ends of a spectrum of severity.