egregious violation

USAGE SUMMARY

'egregious violation' is a correct and usable term in written English.
You can use it when referring to an action that is particularly bad, especially when it is so bad that it is shocking or striking. For example: "The corporation's egregious violation of safety regulations forced the government to take immediate action."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

What more egregious violation of the Constitution could there be?

The New York Times

"It is about the most egregious violation of privacy imaginable.

The New Yorker

PEOPLE can usually recognise an egregious violation of religious freedom when they see one.

The Economist

"We believe that this was an egregious violation of the statute," she said.

The New York Times - Arts

We do not expect to see much enforcement unless there's an egregious violation".

The New York Times

Given the egregious violation of the cessation of hostilities we will reassess the future prospects for cooperation with Russia".

The Guardian

"It is simply astounding that any member of the executive branch could have believed that our Constitution justified this egregious violation of plaintiffs' rights," Judge Holloway wrote.

The New York Times

The statement said police officers had been trying to "defuse the chaotic situation" in Elevate, which was 58 percent over its legal occupancy — an "egregious violation".

The New York Times

This egregious violation of the spirit of the Fundamental Laws lost him the support of the Octobrists, who went into opposition.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"This is an egregious violation of the ratings and review system used by Amazon," a customer named Robert S. Pollock wrote in a review he titled "scam".

The New York Times - Tech

Her case illustrates the conflict between lawmakers and the ethics committee over whether her actions represent a widely accepted norm or an egregious violation of the ethics rules.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "egregious violation", ensure the context clearly establishes the rule, law, or principle that has been violated. This adds clarity and strengthens the impact of the statement.

Common error

Avoid using "egregious violation" to describe minor offenses or trivial errors. This phrase should be reserved for truly shocking or severe breaches, as overuse dilutes its impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "egregious violation" functions as a noun phrase, where 'egregious' modifies the noun 'violation'. It identifies a specific instance of wrongdoing, often emphasized by the severity and shocking nature of the act. The Ludwig AI confirms this is a correct and usable term in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Formal & Business

15%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Science

4%

Reference

2%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "egregious violation" is a commonly used phrase to describe actions that represent a severe breach of rules or ethical standards. Ludwig AI validates that the phrase is grammatically correct. It is most frequently found in news and media, as well as in formal and business contexts. The phrase is used to strongly condemn an action and highlight its severity. Alternatives such as "blatant violation" or "flagrant violation" can be used to convey a similar meaning, depending on the specific context. When using "egregious violation", ensure that the context is clear and the violation is indeed severe to maintain the impact of the phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

blatant violation

Emphasizes the obvious and unconcealed nature of the violation.

flagrant violation

Highlights the scandalous and openly offensive nature of the violation.

gross violation

Stresses the unacceptable and extreme nature of the violation.

serious breach

Focuses on the significant breaking of a rule or agreement.

major infringement

Highlights the substantial degree to which a rule or law has been violated.

outrageous breach

Emphasizes the shocking and unacceptable nature of the breach.

heinous transgression

Draws attention to the wickedness and reprehensibility of the act.

atrocious infraction

Focuses on the appalling and terrible nature of the infraction.

severe contravention

Highlights the strict and forceful opposition to a rule or law.

extreme dereliction

Focuses on the severe neglect or failure to fulfill a duty or obligation.

FAQs

How to use "egregious violation" in a sentence?

Use "egregious violation" to describe actions that severely breach rules or ethical standards. For instance, "The company's actions were an egregious violation of environmental regulations."

What can I say instead of "egregious violation"?

You can use alternatives like "blatant violation", "flagrant violation", or "gross violation" depending on the context.

What's the difference between "egregious violation" and "minor infraction"?

"Egregious violation" refers to a severe and shocking breach, while "minor infraction" describes a less significant offense. The former implies serious consequences, while the latter suggests a lighter penalty.

Is "egregious violation" formal or informal?

"Egregious violation" leans towards the formal side due to "egregious" being a sophisticated adjective. However, it's suitable for news, legal documents, and professional contexts.