gross deficiencies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "gross deficiencies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe significant shortcomings or failures in a particular context, such as performance, quality, or standards. Example: "The report highlighted gross deficiencies in the safety protocols that need immediate attention."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Gross deficiencies An inquest into Kevin Jacobs' death found his death was "suicide to which neglect contributed".

The Guardian

To their credit the Defense Department and the V.A. are now trying mightily to make up for the gross deficiencies in their level of preparation for these numbers of mental injuries.

The New York Times

The localization of other synaptic proteins in uev-1-mutant interneurons appears normal, indicating that the GLR-1 trafficking defects are not due to gross deficiencies in synapse formation or overall protein trafficking.

Plosone

Gross deficiencies in the quality of care provided to women during childbirth are widely recognized in West Africa [ 8].

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

However, the use of a parallel design can provide useful information on gross deficiencies in the absorption process of different anthelmintic formulations [ 10].

BMC Veterinary Research

In E. coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Bartonella bacilliformis, deletion of the nudH gene resulted in gross deficiencies in the ability of these organisms to invade mammalian cells [ 68, 69].

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

This gross deficiency began to be remedied in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

The Guardian

On the other hand, gross deficiency in CBS activity is associated with homocystinuria, an inborn recessive metabolic disorder [ 4].

Behavioral and Brain Functions

First, there is a gross deficiency in the actual number of health workers in Africa, affecting all cadres.

Human Resources for Health

Our data, combined with those of others 11, 12, indicate that there is no gross deficiency in these critical features in the absence of T-bet.

European Journal of Immunology

To understand the role of OXPHOS in determining sensitivity to etoposide and other anticancer agents, we used cells lacking complex-I, complex-II, and mitochondrial protein synthesis (gross OXPHOS deficiency due to lack of mtDNA-encoded subunits of complexes-I, -III, -IV, and -V) and measured caspase activation after treatment with anticancer agents.

Cell Death and Disease

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "gross deficiencies", ensure the context clearly indicates what specific area or system exhibits the shortcomings. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "gross deficiencies" as a blanket term for any problem. Be specific about the nature and extent of the deficiency to provide a more accurate and informative assessment.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "gross deficiencies" primarily functions as a noun phrase acting as the subject or object in a sentence. It describes a state of lacking or falling short, where the adjective "gross" intensifies the significance of the "deficiencies". Ludwig AI confirms that it is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "gross deficiencies" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase in written English, denoting significant shortcomings or failures. Ludwig AI's analysis shows that it's most frequently found in scientific and news-related contexts. While the phrase is clear and understandable, consider using alternatives like "significant shortcomings" or "major flaws" for variety or greater precision. When using the phrase, ensure you clearly specify the area or system to which the deficiencies relate to avoid ambiguity. This helps in clear and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant shortcomings

Replaces "gross deficiencies" with a more general term for failures or inadequacies, emphasizing the importance rather than the scale of the problem.

major flaws

Focuses on the imperfections within a system or process, rather than a lack or absence.

serious inadequacies

Highlights the insufficient quality or quantity of something, emphasizing a severe lack of what is needed.

substantial defects

Emphasizes significant imperfections or faults.

severe shortcomings

Focuses on critical failures or inadequacies, emphasizing the gravity of the problem.

critical failures

Focuses on the aspect of complete breakdown or non-performance.

glaring omissions

Highlights significant things that have been left out or neglected.

egregious errors

Focuses specifically on mistakes that are remarkably bad or shocking.

pronounced weaknesses

Emphasizes clear and noticeable areas of vulnerability or lack of strength.

marked limitations

Highlights clear boundaries or constraints, indicating restricted capabilities.

FAQs

How can I use "gross deficiencies" in a sentence?

You can use "gross deficiencies" to describe significant shortcomings. For example, "The audit revealed "gross deficiencies" in the company's financial reporting processes.".

What are some alternatives to "gross deficiencies"?

Alternatives to "gross deficiencies" include "significant shortcomings", "major flaws", or "serious inadequacies", depending on the specific context.

What is the difference between "gross deficiencies" and "minor deficiencies"?

"Gross deficiencies" implies substantial or significant shortcomings, while "minor deficiencies" suggests less significant or trivial issues. The choice depends on the severity of the problem being described.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use the term "gross deficiencies"?

The term "gross deficiencies" is appropriate in contexts where the shortcomings are substantial and have significant consequences, such as in reports, audits, or formal assessments of performance or quality.