glaring lacuna

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "glaring lacuna" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a significant gap or omission in information, knowledge, or understanding that is very noticeable. Example: "The report had a glaring lacuna regarding the financial projections, which raised concerns among the stakeholders."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

One glaring lacuna in the international effort is the lack of focus on developing a justice system.

The New York Times

There's one particularly glaring lacuna in Bigsby's account.

The New York Times - Books

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The problems were glaring.

The New Yorker

The injustice is glaring".

The New York Times

Glaring at her.

The New Yorker

The changes are glaring.

The New York Times - Sports

The irony was glaring.

The New York Times

It is a glaring omission.

The New York Times

The gap is becoming glaring.

The Economist

Glaring errors jostle quiet omissions.

The New Yorker

Mistakes are plentiful and glaring.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "glaring lacuna" when you want to emphasize a significant and easily noticeable gap or omission in a particular area. It's suitable for formal writing where precision is important.

Common error

Avoid using "glaring lacuna" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler terms like "obvious gap" or "clear omission" are more appropriate for everyday communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "glaring lacuna" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "glaring" modifies the noun "lacuna". The phrase serves to highlight a significant absence or omission in a particular context. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, and the examples showcase it denoting substantial gaps.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "glaring lacuna" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe a significant and noticeable gap or omission. While Ludwig AI confirms its validity, its use is relatively rare and more suited to formal contexts such as news reporting or academic writing. Simpler alternatives like "obvious gap" or "striking omission" may be more appropriate for informal communication. The phrase effectively emphasizes a deficiency and draws attention to areas needing improvement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious omission

Replaces "lacuna" with "omission" and "glaring" with "obvious", maintaining a similar meaning but with simpler vocabulary.

striking gap

Substitutes "glaring" with "striking" and "lacuna" with "gap", conveying a similar sense of noticeable absence.

conspicuous absence

Replaces the entire phrase with a more direct expression indicating something is noticeably missing.

noticeable deficiency

Uses "noticeable" instead of "glaring" and "deficiency" in place of "lacuna", highlighting a clear lack or shortage.

palpable void

Employs "palpable" to emphasize the obviousness of the "void", offering a more figurative expression.

evident shortcoming

Substitutes with "evident" and "shortcoming" to communicate a clear and apparent flaw or lack.

flagrant deficiency

Uses "flagrant" to emphasize the negative aspect of the deficiency, suggesting it is glaring and unacceptable.

significant gap

Replaces "glaring" with "significant" to simply emphasize the importance of the gap.

major oversight

Indicates a significant error or omission that was overlooked.

critical gap

Stresses the importance of the missing element using "critical".

FAQs

How to use "glaring lacuna" in a sentence?

The phrase "glaring lacuna" is used to point out a significant and obvious gap or omission. For example, "There is a "glaring lacuna" in the budget proposal regarding marketing expenses".

What can I say instead of "glaring lacuna"?

You can use alternatives like "obvious omission", "striking gap", or "conspicuous absence" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "glaring lacuna" or "glaring omission"?

Both "glaring lacuna" and "glaring omission" are correct. "Lacuna" is a more formal term for gap or absence, making ""glaring lacuna"" suitable for formal writing, while "glaring omission" is generally more accessible.

What's the difference between "glaring lacuna" and "significant gap"?

"Glaring lacuna" suggests a more noticeable and perhaps problematic absence than "significant gap". A "glaring lacuna" is hard to miss, while a "significant gap" may simply be important.