Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
glaring omission
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The term "glaring omission" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that is obvious when something important is left out. For example, "The speech given by the Senator was well-received, but his glaring omission of important facts made many in the audience skeptical."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(19)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
It is a glaring omission.
News & Media
This is a glaring omission.
News & Media
But the revisions have a glaring omission.
News & Media
Tony Blair is another glaring omission.
News & Media
There is one glaring omission, though.
News & Media
The lack of detail is the book's most glaring omission.
News & Media
Not to do so was craven, a glaring omission.
News & Media
Chief among these failures is one glaring omission.
News & Media
There is a glaring omission from today's film reviews.
News & Media
It is immediately obvious that there is one glaring omission.
News & Media
Amid all the improvement, one glaring omission remains.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "glaring omission", ensure the context clearly establishes what is missing and why its absence is significant.
Common error
Avoid using "glaring omission" for minor or subjective absences. Reserve it for situations where the missing element is objectively important and obviously lacking.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "glaring omission" functions primarily as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically sound and widely used to denote a significant oversight. Examples on Ludwig show its use in various contexts to highlight a clear and important absence.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Science
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "glaring omission" is a noun phrase used to highlight a significant and obvious absence or oversight. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness and common usage, particularly within news and media contexts. The phrase carries a neutral to professional tone and serves to draw attention to deficiencies or flaws in information. When writing, use "glaring omission" to emphasize notable absences, ensuring the context clarifies what is missing and why it's crucial. Related alternatives include "noticeable absence" and "significant oversight" for variety.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
noticeable absence
Focuses on the lack of something being easily observed.
significant oversight
Emphasizes the importance of what was missed.
obvious exclusion
Highlights that the act of leaving something out was clear and apparent.
remarkable lapse
Draws attention to the unexpected or unusual nature of the error.
patent deficiency
Indicates a clear and undeniable lack.
conspicuous absence
Stresses how easily the missing element is noticed.
flagrant exclusion
Implies a deliberate or offensive act of leaving something out.
major shortfall
Highlights the insufficient quantity or extent of something.
striking neglect
Focuses on the inattention or lack of care leading to the omission.
palpable void
Emphasizes the strong feeling of something being missing.
FAQs
How to use "glaring omission" in a sentence?
You can use "glaring omission" to point out a significant thing that has been left out. For instance, "The report was comprehensive, but the "glaring omission" of financial data raised concerns."
What can I say instead of "glaring omission"?
You can use alternatives like "noticeable absence", "significant oversight", or "obvious exclusion" depending on the specific context.
Is it better to say "glaring omission" or "obvious omission"?
"Glaring omission" and "obvious omission" are similar, but "glaring omission" emphasizes the significance and unexpectedness of the absence more strongly than "obvious omission".
What does "glaring omission" imply?
A "glaring omission" implies that something important has been left out and that this absence is easily noticeable and often considered a mistake or oversight.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested