glaring irregularities

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "glaring irregularities" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe obvious or significant discrepancies or inconsistencies in a situation, report, or data. Example: "The audit revealed glaring irregularities in the financial statements that could not be overlooked."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

International monitors from the European Union, the East African Community, and other regional blocs agreed that the election met "minimum international benchmarks for free elections," despite glaring irregularities.

Encyclopedia Britannica

By studying the documents in their own mortgage cases, Epstein, Szymoniak and Redman noticed some glaring irregularities.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

The vicious tribal violence — condemned by one American official this week as "ethnic cleansing" — has spread with stunning speed since late December when Kenya's electoral commission hastily handed a second term to President Mwai Kibaki, despite independent reports of glaring voting irregularities.

The New York Times

They can also be appealed, and are automatically subject to retrial when passed in absentia as was the case with 398 of the 529 condemned men in this case should the convict turn himself in.Legal experts concur that irregularities in this trial appeared so glaring that a retrial would almost certainly produce a lighter verdict.

The Economist

"The irregularities contained within Mac's situation are so glaring that we were baited by the facts of the case," Spell told The Huffington Post.

Huffington Post

Glaring at her.

The New Yorker

The problems were glaring.

The New Yorker

The injustice is glaring".

The New York Times

The changes are glaring.

The New York Times - Sports

The irony was glaring.

The New York Times

The need is glaring.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing problems or errors, use "glaring irregularities" to emphasize the obviousness and severity of the issues, prompting immediate attention and action.

Common error

Avoid using "glaring irregularities" in contexts where the discrepancies are minor or subjective. Overusing the phrase can diminish its impact and make your writing seem hyperbolic. Instead, reserve it for truly significant and easily noticeable problems.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "glaring irregularities" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "glaring" modifies the noun "irregularities". It serves to highlight the obvious and significant nature of deviations from what is expected or correct. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Encyclopedias

20%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "glaring irregularities" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase that effectively describes obvious and significant discrepancies. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. While not exceedingly common, it finds frequent use in news and media, encyclopedias, and other contexts where highlighting deviations is crucial. When using this phrase, ensure the irregularities are indeed obvious and significant to maintain impact and avoid hyperbole. Alternatives like "obvious anomalies" or "evident discrepancies" can be used depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious anomalies

Replaces "irregularities" with "anomalies" and "glaring" with "obvious", maintaining the emphasis on clear deviations.

evident discrepancies

Substitutes "glaring" with "evident", highlighting the readily apparent nature of the "discrepancies".

flagrant violations

Replaces "irregularities" with "violations" and "glaring" with "flagrant", suggesting a more serious and deliberate breach.

conspicuous errors

Emphasizes that the "errors" are easily noticeable, replacing "glaring" with "conspicuous".

noticeable inconsistencies

Highlights the easily detected nature of the "inconsistencies", conveying a similar meaning.

patent defects

Indicates obvious and readily apparent flaws, shifting the context slightly toward tangible imperfections.

overt flaws

Similar to "patent defects", but less technical, indicating openly visible imperfections.

manifest abnormalities

Replaces "irregularities" with a more clinical term, "abnormalities", while keeping the obviousness.

undeniable faults

Shifts the focus to the impossibility of denying the existence of "faults".

blatant errors

Uses "blatant" to emphasize the obvious and often offensive nature of the "errors".

FAQs

How can I use "glaring irregularities" in a sentence?

You can use "glaring irregularities" to describe obvious and significant discrepancies. For example, "The audit revealed "glaring irregularities" in the company's financial records.".

What can I say instead of "glaring irregularities"?

You can use alternatives like "obvious anomalies", "evident discrepancies", or "flagrant violations" depending on the context.

Are "glaring irregularities" formal or informal?

"Glaring irregularities" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts, but it is most impactful in professional and news settings where objectivity and accuracy are crucial.

What's the difference between "glaring irregularities" and "minor discrepancies"?

"Glaring irregularities" indicates significant, easily noticeable issues, while "minor discrepancies" refers to small, less significant differences. The former demands immediate attention, whereas the latter may require only routine adjustments.