flagrant violations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "flagrant violations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe serious or blatant breaches of rules, laws, or standards. Example: "The organization faced severe penalties due to its flagrant violations of environmental regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Mostly flagrant violations of the Highway Code.

The Guardian - Film

Flagrant violations occur without so any serious investigation.

The New York Times

It also urged the Syrian regime to "put an end to flagrant violations of international law".

Independent

Others balked at the seeming flagrant violations of a city law.

The New York Times

With no oversight, the government allows flagrant violations of law to go unpunished.

The New York Times

"I see these amazingly flagrant violations of the building code with regard to soundproofing.

The New York Times

The petition accuses the Iranian government of "flagrant violations of international law" during a year of "arbitrary and unlawful" detention.

Independent

Johnson grew increasingly concerned about what he believed to be flagrant violations of official guidelines about the care of children.

The Guardian

The members have developed a habit of letting the parties get away with flagrant violations of the law.

The New York Times

It took years to discover what the comptroller's office suggested were flagrant violations of local insurance rules.

The New York Times

According to a human-rights organisation, 500 people were left homeless as a result.Yasser Arafat railed against these actions as "flagrant violations" of Mr Tenet's ceasefire.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal or ethical breaches, use "flagrant violations" to emphasize the severity and intentional nature of the misconduct. This adds weight to your argument.

Common error

While "flagrant violations" is impactful, overuse can dilute its strength. Reserve it for situations where the breach is genuinely egregious to maintain its effectiveness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "flagrant violations" primarily functions as a noun phrase, acting as the subject or object in a sentence. It denotes serious and conspicuous breaches of rules, laws, or agreements. Ludwig's examples show it describing infringements in legal, ethical, and regulatory contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Formal & Business

16%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Science

5%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "flagrant violations" is a noun phrase that describes serious and obvious breaches of rules or laws. Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically correct and frequently used, particularly in news and media contexts, to emphasize the severity and often intentional nature of misconduct. While suitable for formal writing, it should be used judiciously to maintain its impact. Alternative phrases include "blatant breaches" and "egregious breaches", each offering a slightly different nuance. This phrase effectively conveys a strong sense of disapproval and condemnation of the actions described.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

blatant breaches

Emphasizes the obvious and unconcealed nature of the violations.

egregious breaches

Highlights the shocking and appalling nature of the violations.

gross infringements

Stresses the unacceptable and severe nature of the infringements.

outrageous transgressions

Focuses on the offensive and unacceptable character of the transgressions.

manifest contraventions

Highlights the clear and undeniable nature of the contraventions.

evident breaches

Underscores how easily observable the breaches are.

obvious infringements

Focuses on the readily apparent nature of the infringements.

striking transgressions

Emphasizes the noticeable and remarkable nature of the transgressions.

severe contraventions

Highlights the serious and harsh character of the contraventions.

glaring infringements

Stresses the obvious and easily noticeable nature of the infringements.

FAQs

How can I use "flagrant violations" in a sentence?

You can use "flagrant violations" to describe serious and obvious breaches of rules or laws. For example: "The company faced severe penalties due to its flagrant violations of environmental regulations."

What are some alternatives to "flagrant violations"?

Alternatives include "blatant breaches", "egregious breaches", or "gross infringements" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What is the difference between "flagrant violations" and "minor infractions"?

"Flagrant violations" refer to serious and intentional breaches of rules or laws, while "minor infractions" are less severe and often unintentional. The former carries a connotation of deliberate misconduct, while the latter suggests a simple mistake or oversight.

Is it appropriate to use "flagrant violations" in formal writing?

Yes, "flagrant violations" is suitable for formal writing, especially when discussing legal, ethical, or regulatory matters. Its strong connotation makes it effective for highlighting serious misconduct.