Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
fully excluded
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "fully excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is completely left out or not included in a particular context or situation. Example: "The participants who did not meet the criteria were fully excluded from the study."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
"Sometimes he would be fully excluded for something that seemed incredibly minor.
News & Media
The influence of contact resistance could not be fully excluded.
Science
In classical set theory, elements fully belong to a set or are fully excluded.
A couple of islands in the middle, around 250 GeV, have not been fully excluded yet.
News & Media
Previous claims for blur adaptation must therefore rest on more complex factors that are not fully excluded in clinical settings.
Science
However, additional effects on the tumour microenvironment caused by PTX cannot be fully excluded, since cellular and tumour microenvironmental effects are known to complement each other [31].
Science
Capsaicin-induced vasoconstriction is generally regarded as a direct vascular action of capsaicin [54 56], although a TRPV1 receptor mediated effect can not be fully excluded [57].
Although, representativeness of the sample was shown, as the responders and non-responders distribution with respect to age and gender were comparable, participation bias cannot be fully excluded.
Missing data can be considered random and therefore effect cohort size rather than the results, although the introduction of bias cannot be fully excluded.
Science
Therefore, false negative haplogroup assignments cannot be fully excluded.
Science
Then, since the primary findings of ADC changes are located close to grey matter/liquid interface, the potential contribution from partial volume effects cannot be fully excluded.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "fully excluded", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being excluded and the reason for its exclusion to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "fully excluded" in casual conversation or informal writing; opt for simpler alternatives like "left out" or "not included" for a more natural tone.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
Fully excluded functions as a verb phrase, where "fully" modifies "excluded" to emphasize the completeness of the exclusion. It's used to indicate that something or someone is entirely left out or not considered. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts.
Frequent in
Science
75%
News & Media
20%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "fully excluded" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate a complete exclusion. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, it serves to express a definitive removal or non-inclusion. Ludwig AI highlights the correctness of the phrase, suggesting its reliability in formal writing. While alternatives like "completely omitted" or "entirely left out" exist, "fully excluded" maintains a strong presence in contexts requiring precision and clarity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
completely omitted
Emphasizes the act of leaving something out entirely.
entirely left out
Highlights the action of not including something, with a sense of completeness.
totally disregarded
Focuses on ignoring or paying no attention to something, leading to its exclusion.
wholly rejected
Implies a complete refusal or dismissal, resulting in exclusion.
absolutely barred
Suggests a strict prohibition or prevention, leading to exclusion.
perfectly precluded
Indicates that something is made impossible or prevented entirely.
categorically dismissed
Emphasizes a clear and unambiguous rejection, leading to exclusion.
definitively ruled out
Indicates a final and conclusive decision to exclude something.
thoroughly eliminated
Highlights the act of removing something completely and carefully.
utterly disqualified
Implies that someone or something is completely ineligible or unfit.
FAQs
How can I use "fully excluded" in a sentence?
You can use "fully excluded" to indicate that something or someone has been completely left out or not considered. For example, "Participants who did not meet the criteria were "fully excluded" from the study."
What are some alternatives to "fully excluded"?
Alternatives to "fully excluded" include "completely omitted", "entirely left out", or "totally disregarded", depending on the specific context.
Is it better to say "completely excluded" or "fully excluded"?
Both "completely excluded" and "fully excluded" are grammatically correct and have similar meanings. The choice often depends on stylistic preference, although "completely excluded" might sound slightly more natural in some contexts.
What's the difference between "excluded" and "fully excluded"?
While "excluded" simply means not included, "fully excluded" emphasizes the completeness of the exclusion. The addition of "fully" reinforces that there are no exceptions or partial inclusions.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested