full of dust

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "full of dust" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it anytime you want to describe something that is covered in dust. For example, "The attic was full of dust after being neglected for years."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

The air's full of dust.

The New Yorker

"They get full of dust.

The New York Times

They were full of dust.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"The trees are full of dust, the grass is full of dust.

The Guardian

The air was full of dust and smoke.

The Guardian

The skies were dark and full of dust thrown up by a fierce, cold wind.

The New York Times

One police officer who survived talked to reporters, his uniform full of dust.

The New York Times

"You could see the back end, full of dust, with the wires all taped up".

The New Yorker

Husband: But they are probably full of dust mites and other gross stuff.

The New York Times - Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

Now, a Hubble camera has unveiled the full band of dust by placing a small disk in front of the star to eclipse its blazing light.

Science Magazine

It is full of toxic dust.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing an enclosed space, like a room or container, use "full of dust" to convey that the dust occupies a significant volume. For example, "The attic was full of dust."

Common error

Avoid using "full of dust" to describe a surface that merely has a thin layer of dust. Opt for "covered in dust" or "dusty" to accurately represent a surface coating.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "full of dust" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate that it contains or is characterized by a significant amount of dust. The Ludwig examples demonstrate it in varied contexts, from describing rooms to the air itself.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Wiki

12%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

8%

Science

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "full of dust" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe something that contains a significant amount of dust. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's suitable for various contexts, particularly in news and media. While alternatives like "covered in dust" and "dusty" exist, "full of dust" emphasizes the volume or extent of dust contamination. When using this phrase, ensure it accurately reflects the described situation, avoiding misuse for mere surface coatings. With a neutral register, it fits well in diverse writing styles and is frequently found in reputable sources like The New York Times and The Guardian.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

covered in dust

Focuses on the surface being coated with dust.

dust-filled

A direct synonym, but slightly less common.

thick with dust

Highlights the density or concentration of dust.

dust-laden

Emphasizes the weight or presence of dust.

filled with particulate matter

More formal and scientific, referring to fine particles in general.

grimy with dust

Suggests a dirty or unpleasant quality due to the dust.

coated with grime

Similar to "grimy with dust", but broadens the type of dirt.

powdered with dust

Implies a fine, even coating of dust.

befouled with dust

Emphasizes the contamination caused by the dust.

suffused with dust

Suggests that the dust permeates the entire space or object.

FAQs

How can I use "full of dust" in a sentence?

You can use "full of dust" to describe something that contains a large quantity of dust. For example, "The old warehouse was "full of dust" and debris."

What are some alternatives to saying "full of dust"?

Alternatives include "covered in dust", "dust-laden", or "dusty", depending on the context.

Which is correct, "full of dust" or "filled with dust"?

Both "full of dust" and "filled with dust" are grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably, though "full of dust" might be slightly more common.

What's the difference between "dusty" and "full of dust"?

"Dusty" generally describes something that has a layer of dust on its surface, whereas "full of dust" implies a greater quantity of dust occupying a space or object.