for technical replicates

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for technical replicates" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific or research contexts when discussing experiments that involve repeating measurements or observations to ensure accuracy and reliability. Example: "The results were consistent across all samples, confirming the validity of the findings for technical replicates."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

44 human-written examples

Standard deviation was calculated for technical replicates.

Plosone

Similar findings were observed for technical replicates (Supplementary Figure S2).

Plosone

Mean Ct dispersal for technical replicates did not exceed 0,3 cycle.

Plosone

The random effect for technical replicates was handled by pooling the variances across replicates using the method of reference [44].

Plosone

The Pearson correlation between biological replicates was greater than 0.90, comparable to the correlation coefficient previously shown for technical replicates [16].

Plosone

Two or three 60-mer probes were designed per EST, and all probes were printed on the array to account for technical replicates.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

16 human-written examples

αtri is a random effect for technical replicate i within each biological replicate r, which is assumed to be uncorrelated with mean zero and variance σ2α.

Plosone

This resulted in four lists of p-values: ratio-based and intensity-based p-values for technical replicate C1, and ratio-based and intensity-based p-values for technical replicate C2.

BMC Genomics

We used this tool to fit data for technical replicate and cumulative percent target region sequenced (span = 0.75).

BMC Genomics

Quantification cycle values from qPCR were obtained for three technical replicates for each of the 3 biological replicates for each gene evaluated per plant genotype.

BMC Plant Biology

Amplification was carried out for three technical replicates for each sample, including negative controls.

BMC Genomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting statistical measures like standard deviation or coefficient of variation, clearly state that these are calculated "for technical replicates" to avoid ambiguity with biological replicates.

Common error

Avoid generalizing conclusions drawn from technical replicates to biological inferences. Technical replicates assess experimental precision, while biological replicates reflect true biological variability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for technical replicates" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a verb or noun to specify the scope or context of an action or measurement. As Ludwig AI shows, it clarifies that a given calculation, observation, or result applies specifically to technical replicates, not biological ones.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for technical replicates" is a prepositional phrase used extensively in scientific writing to specify that an analysis or result pertains to the consistency of experimental procedures, as identified by Ludwig AI. This distinction is crucial for avoiding ambiguity and ensuring the accurate interpretation of research findings. Its register is formal and scientific, predominantly appearing in academic journals. When using this phrase, ensure clear differentiation from biological replicates to maintain precision. Ludwig highlights the phrase's correct usage and high frequency in scientific contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

regarding technical replicates

Replaces the preposition "for" with "regarding", indicating a focus on the topic of technical replicates.

concerning technical replicates

Similar to "regarding", this alternative also emphasizes the subject matter of technical replicates.

in the context of technical replicates

This phrase expands on the original, specifying that the statement applies within the framework of technical replicates.

with respect to technical replicates

Indicates that what follows is specifically relevant to technical replicates.

pertaining to technical replicates

A more formal way of saying "related to" technical replicates.

in relation to technical replicates

Highlights the connection or association with technical replicates.

considering technical replicates

Emphasizes that technical replicates are being taken into account.

when using technical replicates

Focuses on the action of using technical replicates and the implications thereof.

in experiments with technical replicates

Clarifies that technical replicates are part of an experimental design.

employing technical replicates

A more formal and concise way of indicating the use of technical replicates.

FAQs

What is the purpose of using "for technical replicates" in scientific writing?

Using "for technical replicates" clarifies that the analysis or results being discussed pertain specifically to the consistency and reliability of the experimental procedure itself, rather than biological variation. It indicates that the focus is on minimizing errors in measurement or execution.

How does using the term "for technical replicates" improve the clarity of a scientific paper?

It distinguishes between variations arising from the experimental process (technical replicates) and those arising from biological differences. This distinction is crucial for assessing the validity and generalizability of research findings. Without this clarification, it can be difficult to interpret the sources of variability in the data.

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "for technical replicates"?

While it's crucial to be precise, you could use phrases like "regarding technical replicates", "concerning technical replicates", or "in the context of technical replicates" depending on the specific context. These alternatives, like "regarding technical replicates", "concerning technical replicates", or "in the context of technical replicates", maintains accuracy but may provide a slightly different emphasis.

When should I specify "for technical replicates" versus simply stating "replicates"?

Always specify "for technical replicates" when you need to emphasize that you are referring specifically to replicates used to assess experimental consistency, as opposed to "biological replicates", which assess biological variability. Using simply "replicates" may cause ambiguity.