for talks with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for talks with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to discussions or negotiations that are planned or taking place with a specific person or group. Example: "The president is scheduled for talks with the leaders of several countries to discuss trade agreements."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

ETA has asked for talks with Spain and France.

The Economist

It is making unctuous appeals for talks with the South.

The Economist

Austria had pushed for talks with Croatia to begin.

The New York Times

Absolutely right: Zimbabwe, for talks with Robert Mugabe.

The Guardian - Sport

Mr. Lavrov was expected to go to Damascus for talks with Mr. Assad on Tuesday.

The New York Times

The current PRI governor, Rene Juarez, has called for talks with the rebels.

The Economist

She acted while the prime minister was in America, for talks with President Bush.

The Economist

See articleBinyamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, went to Washington for talks with Barack Obama.

The Economist

Mr Hammond, in Paris for talks with his French and German counterparts, said: "Assad must go.

Independent

These groups are unlikely to remain quiet.This week Mr Morales called for talks with the opposition.

The Economist

As it happens, Mr Murdoch was in London this week for talks with his executives.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Make sure the context clarifies the subject of the "talks" to provide a comprehensive understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "for talks with" if the meeting's purpose is primarily for something other than discussions, such as a celebration or inspection. Use more specific language to convey the correct intention.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for talks with" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating the purpose or reason for someone's visit or meeting. It generally describes the intention of engaging in discussions or negotiations with a specific individual or group. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and frequent usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

85%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for talks with" is a grammatically sound and widely used prepositional phrase. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is commonly found in news and formal contexts, emphasizing the intention to engage in discussions or negotiations. When writing, ensure the context aligns with meaningful conversations rather than general social meetings. Consider alternatives like "to negotiate with" or "to discuss matters with" to refine the specificity of your statement. By understanding these nuances, you can effectively utilize "for talks with" to communicate the purpose of an encounter precisely.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to negotiate with

Focuses specifically on negotiation as the purpose of the interaction.

to discuss matters with

Emphasizes the exchange of information and opinions.

to have discussions with

Highlights the act of engaging in conversation.

in order to confer with

Implies a more formal and consultative interaction.

to engage in dialogue with

Suggests an open and cooperative exchange.

aiming to consult with

Focuses on seeking advice or opinions.

seeking to parley with

Indicates a formal meeting, often between opposing sides.

planning to meet with

Highlights the scheduled encounter.

arranging to interface with

Focuses on creating a connection or interface for communication.

intending to parlay with

Signals a negotiation or discussion, often with a specific goal.

FAQs

How can I use "for talks with" in a sentence?

You can use "for talks with" to indicate the purpose of a meeting or visit. For example, "The president traveled to Europe "for talks with" European leaders".

What are some alternatives to "for talks with"?

Alternatives include "to negotiate with", "to discuss matters with", or "to have discussions with", depending on the specific context.

Is "for talks with" formal or informal?

"For talks with" is generally considered neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts, although it is more common in news and professional settings.

What's the difference between "for talks with" and "to meet with"?

"For talks with" specifically indicates that the purpose of the meeting is to have discussions, while "to meet with" is a more general phrase that doesn't specify the purpose of the meeting. The president might travel "for talks with" someone to negotiate a deal, or simply "to meet with" them for a social occasion.