to meet with

USAGE SUMMARY

"to meet with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an appointment, screening, interview, or meeting. For example, "I have a meeting with my boss this afternoon to discuss my job performance."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I asked to meet with the sellers.

The New York Times

Mr. McKenzie wanted to meet with him.

The New York Times - Arts

I have to meet with international clients.

The New York Times

They wanted to meet with the clients".

The New York Times - Sports

"I want to meet with American investors".

The New Yorker

"Make an appointment to meet with her".

The New York Times

I never expected to meet with her".

The New York Times

Finally, Jacqui agreed to meet with him.

The New Yorker

Offers to meet with demonstrators.

The New Yorker

They didn't have to meet with professors.

The New Yorker

I didn't want to meet with him.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "to meet with" when you want to emphasize the purpose or intention behind the meeting, suggesting a deliberate arrangement to discuss something.

Common error

Avoid using "to meet with" when the context already implies a meeting or scheduled event. For example, instead of saying "I have to meet with the team this afternoon for a team meeting", you can say "I have to meet with the team this afternoon".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to meet with" functions as an infinitive phrase indicating an intention or arrangement for a meeting or discussion. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through numerous examples across varied contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Formal & Business

25%

Science

9%

Less common in

Wiki

9%

HuffPost

7%

BMC Medical Education

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "to meet with" is a versatile phrase used to express the intention or arrangement of a meeting or discussion. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and widely used, especially in news, business, and formal contexts. While "to meet" is a more general term, "to meet with" emphasizes the purpose behind the arrangement. Remember to avoid redundancy by ensuring the context doesn't already imply a meeting. By understanding its function, communicative purpose, and register, you can effectively incorporate "to meet with" into your writing. Consider alternatives like "to have a meeting with" or "to arrange to see" for stylistic variation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to have a meeting with

Replaces "meet" with "have a meeting", adding a slight emphasis on the meeting itself.

to have an appointment with

Indicates a formal, scheduled meeting, typically for professional or medical purposes.

to schedule a meeting with

Focuses on the act of scheduling the meeting, implying a formal arrangement.

to hold a discussion with

Highlights the discussion aspect of the meeting.

to arrange to see

Uses "see" instead of "meet", offering a more general term for an encounter.

to sit down with

Emphasizes a more relaxed and conversational setting for the meeting.

to get together with

More informal, suggesting a casual meeting or gathering.

to confer with

Suggests a formal discussion or exchange of opinions.

to consult with

Implies seeking advice or expertise during the meeting.

to interview

Specifically refers to a meeting for evaluation or assessment, often in a professional context.

FAQs

How can I use "to meet with" in a sentence?

The phrase "to meet with" is used to indicate an arrangement or intention to have a meeting or discussion with someone. For example, "I need to "to meet with" the manager to discuss my performance".

What are some alternatives to "to meet with"?

You can use alternatives like "to have a meeting with", "to schedule a meeting with", or "to arrange to see" depending on the context.

Is it more formal to say "to meet with" or "to have a meeting with"?

"To have a meeting with" is slightly more formal than "to meet with", as it explicitly states the purpose of the encounter. Both are acceptable in professional settings, but "to have a meeting with" might be preferred in very formal communication.

When should I use "to meet with" instead of just "to meet"?

Use "to meet with" when you want to emphasize the purpose or intention behind the meeting. "To meet" is more general, while ""to meet with"" implies a deliberate arrangement for discussion or consultation.