Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

for both procedures

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for both procedures" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to two specific procedures that are being discussed or compared. Example: "The results were consistent for both procedures, indicating that they are equally effective."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The total fee for both procedures, $10,000, was well worth it, she said.

News & Media

The New York Times

The success rate was 100% for both procedures.

Satisfactory values of relative errors were obtained for both procedures.

Science

Talanta

The surgical technique for both procedures was similar and is published elsewhere [13].

The safety of a factor must be calculated for both procedures.

For both procedures, the films consist in mixture of at least two different covalently grafted species.

As a final step for both procedures, the zeolite was dissolved in hydrofluoric acid.

Science

Carbon

Safety factors for both procedures are satisfactory with m-k values slightly more safety than PSC values.

We can see that for both procedures, the forecast errors are slightly increased with respect to (h = 1).

In fact, for both procedures the interaction of all common factors is important to reduce the forecast errors.

Forty components were identified in the essential oils representing over 97% of the total GC peak areas for both procedures.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Replace "for both procedures" with "in both processes" or "regarding both methods" to add variety to your writing and avoid repetition.

Common error

Avoid using "for both procedures" if the specific procedures being referred to are not explicitly mentioned or easily understood from the context. Always ensure clarity to prevent confusion.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for both procedures" typically functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause to specify that something applies equally or similarly to two distinct processes. This aligns with Ludwig AI's indication that the phrase is correct and usable, and supported by the examples provided.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

88%

News & Media

7%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for both procedures" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, particularly in scientific and formal contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it effectively clarifies that a statement or condition applies equally to two specific procedures. While alternatives like ""in both processes"" or ""regarding both methods"" exist, ensure clarity by explicitly defining the procedures being referenced. Avoid redundancy but prioritize precision, especially in technical writing. Remember that Ludwig can always provide more examples for better comprehension.

FAQs

How can I use "for both procedures" in a sentence?

You can use "for both procedures" to indicate that a statement applies equally to two previously mentioned processes or actions. For example, "The safety protocols were identical "for both procedures"".

What are some alternatives to using "for both procedures"?

Alternatives include phrases like ""in both processes"", ""regarding both methods"", or "for the two methods", depending on the specific context and desired nuance.

Is it redundant to use "for both procedures" if the context already implies two procedures?

While the context might imply two procedures, using "for both procedures" can enhance clarity and avoid potential ambiguity, especially in technical or formal writing. It explicitly confirms that the statement applies to both.

What's the difference between "for both procedures" and "for each procedure"?

"For both procedures" indicates that something applies collectively to two procedures, whereas "for each procedure" implies that something applies individually and separately to each of the two procedures. The choice depends on whether you're discussing a shared aspect or individual aspects.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: