Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
The smoothing (point 1) is common for the two methods.
Figure 9 shows PVG peak power for the two methods.
Validation data were presented for the two methods.
A validation test for the two methods is conducted.
The magnitude of the error variance was also similar for the two methods.
The mean recoveries for simultaneous determination were between 99.9-101.3% for the two methods.
As for the two methods, we follow the abovementioned experimental settings.
Figure 2 displays the resulting empirical MSE versus the running time for the two methods.
The relative PDs for the two methods were similar (Table 5).
Water was chosen finally as the best diluting solvent for the two methods.
The variance expressions for the two methods are derived and confirmed by computer simulations.
More suggestions(16)
for the two procedures
for the two means
for the two modes
for the two devices
for the two terms
for the two measures
for the two method
for the two mode
to both methods
for the two ways
for both of the methods
for both of these methods
for the two approaches
for the 2 methods
for both methods
for the both methods
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com