followed with

USAGE SUMMARY

"followed with" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to emphasize that one action immediately took place after another. For example, "She finished her presentation and was followed with a round of applause."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

General Writing

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Granderson followed with his homer.

The New York Times

He followed with a layup.

The New York Times - Sports

I followed with the briefcase.

The New Yorker

Rooks followed with 14.

The New York Times - Sports

Sosa followed with 66.

The New York Times - Sports

Pierzynski followed with a looper to left.

The New York Times

Uggla followed with a ground-rule double.

The New York Times - Sports

Letterman followed with a mock-Leno voice.

The New York Times

Siff followed with a very long speech.

The New Yorker

Global regulators followed with their own crackdown.

The New York Times

Ciriaco followed with a double to left.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "followed with" to clearly indicate the chronological order of events, creating a smooth narrative flow. For example, "The introduction was compelling, followed with an engaging discussion."

Common error

Avoid using "followed with" when you intend to show a direct causal relationship. "Followed with" indicates sequence, not necessarily consequence. For instance, instead of "The rain started, followed with a flood", use "The rain started, leading to a flood".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "followed with" functions as a transitive verb phrase indicating a sequential action or event. It connects two events in chronological order, showing that one occurred directly after the other. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent and correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Sports

32%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "followed with" is a versatile verb phrase used to indicate that one action or event immediately succeeds another. Ludwig confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used, especially in news, sports reporting, and general writing. While it is suitable for various contexts, ensure that it accurately reflects sequential order rather than causation. Considering semantically similar phrases such as "succeeded by" or "came after" can help to refine your writing. By understanding its function and purpose, you can effectively use "followed with" to enhance clarity and flow in your narratives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

succeeded by

Indicates a direct succession in time or order, emphasizing the transition from one thing to the next.

then occurred

A straightforward way to indicate the sequence of events.

came after

Simply denotes that something happened after a previous event.

was next

Indicates the immediate subsequent event in a sequence.

ensued with

Implies that something happened immediately after and as a result of a previous event.

unfolded with

Suggests a gradual revelation or development after the initial event.

was accompanied by

Highlights that something occurred in conjunction with the previous event, often simultaneously or very closely after.

progressed to

Suggests a forward movement or development to the next stage or action.

continued with

Emphasizes the continuation of an action or series of events.

resulted in

Focuses on the outcome or consequence of the initial action.

FAQs

How can I use "followed with" in a sentence?

Use "followed with" to indicate that an action or event occurred immediately after another. For example, "The presentation ended, "followed with" a Q&A session".

What are some alternatives to "followed with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "succeeded by", "came after", or "ensued with".

Is it correct to say "was followed with"?

Yes, "was followed with" is grammatically correct and is often used in passive voice constructions. For example, "The initial proposal was approved and "was followed with" immediate action".

What is the difference between "followed by" and "followed with"?

"Followed by" indicates a sequence where the emphasis is on what comes next, while "followed with" emphasizes that something was added or included immediately after. For example, "The main course was followed by dessert" versus "The lecture was "followed with" a lively debate".