flagrant infringement

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "flagrant infringement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a blatant or obvious violation of rights, laws, or rules. Example: "The company faced severe penalties for its flagrant infringement of copyright laws."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Many Uighurs see them as a flagrant infringement upon their rights, tantamount to a sort of cultural genocide.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

By taking appropriate action to hold wrongdoers accountable, the Department of Justice is sending a clear message that flagrant infringements of our historic civil rights will not go unnoticed or unpunished".

Huffington Post

"The whole [focus] on infringement as opposed to flagrant violation means everybody's guilty," says J.D. Kleinke, a prominent medical economist and author in Denver.

Forbes

Only one flagrant violation involved Twitter.

The New York Times - Sports

"This is a flagrant violation of privacy," said the representative.

Independent

"This is a flagrant violation of privacy," they told Buzzfeed.

Independent

Its flagrant copying and massive infringement must stop".

BBC

According to the state news agency Sana, the foreign ministry said Morsi's comments were a "flagrant interference in the Syrian affairs and outright infringement of the Syrians' right to determine their own future".

The Guardian

No flagrant.

The New York Times - Sports

Flagrant display of weapons.

The Washington Post

There were flagrant fouls, yes!

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "flagrant infringement", ensure the context clearly demonstrates a deliberate and obvious violation of a rule, law, or right. This emphasizes the severity and lack of justification for the action.

Common error

Avoid using "flagrant infringement" to describe minor or unintentional violations. This phrase is best reserved for situations where the violation is deliberate, egregious, and easily apparent; otherwise, use milder terms like "technical violation" or "minor breach".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "flagrant infringement" functions as a noun phrase, where "flagrant" acts as an adjective modifying the noun "infringement". The adjective emphasizes the blatant and obvious nature of the violation, as supported by Ludwig AI's analysis and the provided examples.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

50%

Science

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "flagrant infringement" is a noun phrase denoting a blatant and obvious violation, carrying a strong negative connotation. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, though its usage is relatively rare. It appears most frequently in News & Media and Academic contexts, indicating a formal register. Alternatives include "blatant violation" and "egregious transgression". When using this phrase, ensure that the context warrants the strong emphasis it provides, reserving it for situations where the violation is indeed deliberate and egregious.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

blatant violation

Replaces "infringement" with "violation" while maintaining the strong negative connotation of "flagrant".

egregious transgression

Uses stronger synonyms for both "flagrant" and "infringement" to emphasize the severity of the act.

outrageous breach

Substitutes "infringement" with "breach" suggesting a violation of trust or agreement that is shocking.

gross violation

Similar to "blatant violation", but "gross" implies a more crude or obvious nature of the violation.

obvious infringement

Emphasizes the clear and unmistakable nature of the infringement.

wanton violation

Describes a reckless and malicious violation

unjustified intrusion

Focuses on the lack of justification for the infringing action, highlighting its unfairness.

patent infringement

Specifies that the infringement relates to a patent, narrowing the scope of the violation.

deliberate breach

Focuses on the intentional nature of the violation.

copyright violation

More specific, focusing exclusively on violations of copyright law.

FAQs

What does "flagrant infringement" mean?

The phrase "flagrant infringement" refers to a blatant and obvious violation of a law, right, or agreement. The word "flagrant" implies that the violation is done openly and without any attempt to conceal it.

How can I use "flagrant infringement" in a sentence?

Example: "The company faced severe penalties for its "flagrant infringement" of copyright laws".

What are some alternatives to "flagrant infringement"?

You can use alternatives such as "blatant violation", "egregious transgression", or "outrageous breach" depending on the context.

Is "flagrant violation" the same as "flagrant infringement"?

While very similar, "flagrant violation" is a broader term that can apply to any kind of rule or law, whereas "flagrant infringement" often implies a violation of rights, especially intellectual property rights.