blatant violation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "blatant violation" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe an obvious, intentional breach of a law, rule, or agreement. For example: "The company's refusal to follow safety regulations was a blatant violation of OSHA standards."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That amendment is a blatant violation of the First Amendment.

The New York Times

— in blatant violation of Hollywood's dominant "invisible" editing style.

The New York Times

"But it's a blatant violation of human rights".

The New York Times

"This is a blatant violation of China's sovereign rights.

The New York Times

He added: "North Korea's nuclear test is in blatant violation of its international obligations".

Independent

In normal times, collaboration would be a blatant violation of antitrust laws.

The New York Times

Nato ambassadors emerged on Friday morning to accuse Russia of a "blatant violation" of Ukraine's sovereignty.

The Guardian

Constitutional scholars described Rhodes's threats as a blatant violation of free-speech rights.

The Washington Post

Such an act would put Baghdad in blatant violation of Security Council resolutions.

The New York Times

"This is a blatant violation," said Tom Josefiak, Mr. Bush's general counsel.

The New York Times

The State Department said the flight had been made "in blatant violation" of the sanctions.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "blatant violation" when you want to emphasize that a rule, law, or agreement has been openly and obviously broken. It conveys a sense of outrage or disapproval.

Common error

Avoid using "blatant violation" to describe minor or unintentional breaches. "Blatant" implies an obvious and intentional disregard for the rules, so use a milder term like "technicality" or "oversight" for less severe cases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "blatant violation" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object or subject complement in a sentence. It identifies a specific instance where a rule, law, or agreement has been clearly and obviously breached. As Ludwig AI explains, it describes an obvious, intentional breach.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

88%

Formal & Business

7%

Academia

3%

Less common in

Science

1%

Wiki

0%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "blatant violation" is a commonly used noun phrase that describes a clear and obvious breach of a rule, law, or agreement. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability across various contexts. As evidenced by its frequent appearance in news and media sources, it is often used to express disapproval or condemnation, highlighting the severity of the transgression. While suitable for both formal and informal contexts, it's important to use it judiciously, reserving it for truly egregious offenses, as it is a strong statement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

flagrant breach

Replaces "violation" with "breach" and "blatant" with "flagrant", emphasizing the conspicuousness of the violation.

obvious infringement

Substitutes "violation" with "infringement" and "blatant" with "obvious", highlighting the clear and undeniable nature of the transgression.

clear contravention

Replaces "violation" with "contravention", stressing the act of opposing or acting against something, and "blatant" with "clear", pointing to the lack of ambiguity.

egregious transgression

Uses "transgression" instead of "violation" and "egregious" in place of "blatant", emphasizing the shocking and appalling nature of the violation.

unmistakable infraction

Replaces "violation" with "infraction" and "blatant" with "unmistakable", reinforcing the certainty and clarity of the rule-breaking.

palpable offense

Uses "offense" instead of "violation" and "palpable" in place of "blatant", underscoring the tangible and easily perceived nature of the wrongdoing.

outright defiance

Focuses on the act of resistance or disobedience rather than the violation itself, implying an open and direct challenge to authority.

brazen disregard

Emphasizes the lack of shame or embarrassment in ignoring a rule or law, rather than the violation itself.

manifest non-compliance

Highlights the evident failure to adhere to regulations or standards, with a more formal tone.

patent dereliction

Focuses on the failure to fulfill a duty or responsibility in an obvious way.

FAQs

How can I use "blatant violation" in a sentence?

You can use "blatant violation" to describe a clear and obvious breach of a rule, law, or agreement. For example, "The company's actions were a "blatant violation" of environmental regulations."

What are some alternatives to "blatant violation"?

Alternatives include "flagrant breach", "obvious infringement", or "clear contravention". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is "blatant violation" a formal or informal expression?

"Blatant violation" can be used in both formal and informal contexts, but it's important to consider your audience and the overall tone of your writing. It is generally appropriate for news articles, legal documents, and academic papers.

What makes a violation "blatant"?

A violation is considered "blatant" when it is obvious, intentional, and easily recognizable as a breach of the rules or law. It suggests a clear disregard for established norms or regulations.