extensive enough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "extensive enough" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether something meets a certain level of thoroughness or comprehensiveness. Example: "The research conducted was extensive enough to support the conclusions drawn in the study."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

But the adjustment was not extensive enough, and the maneuver failed again.

The New York Times - Arts

The film falls short, however, of demonstrating that the problems were extensive enough to nullify the results.

The New York Times

Coffee plunged on expectations that frost in Brazil was not extensive enough to damage crops of the world's biggest producer.

The New York Times

Some officials have questioned, however, whether the research was extensive enough to be the basis for the reports' conclusions.

The New York Times

Arguably, if the replacement was extensive enough, one would be the same person with a new body.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Although they have a considerable growth of wool on their faces, it is seldom extensive enough to cause wool blindness.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The study included only patients whose operations were extensive enough to require at least five days of hospitalization.

The New York Times - Health

I also collect information on animal courtship, and my knowledge is extensive enough to make David Attenborough blush.

The New York Times

The actual flaws in the Maginot Line were that it was not extensive enough and that, crucially, its defensive role could not be shifted to an offensive one.

The New York Times

So the question is whether the review that detainees may seek in the D. C. Circuit is extensive enough to qualify as such a substitute.

The New York Times

The much ballyhooed Skytrain isn't extensive enough to make a dent in the snarls of vehicles that clog Bangkok streets, seemingly at all hours of the day.

The New York Times - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "extensive enough", ensure the context clearly defines what constitutes 'extensive'. For example, specify whether it refers to data, research, or coverage to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "extensive enough" when a more precise adjective would better convey the degree of extensiveness. For instance, if the research covered all aspects, use "comprehensive" instead of a qualified statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "extensive enough" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate that something possesses a sufficient degree of breadth, depth, or scope. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

32%

News & Media

30%

Encyclopedias

20%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

15%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "extensive enough" is a versatile phrase used to indicate that something is sufficiently thorough or comprehensive for a given purpose. As Ludwig AI confirms, it enjoys widespread use across diverse contexts, including science, news, and encyclopedias. While grammatically sound and frequently employed, writers should ensure the context clearly defines what 'extensive' means and consider more precise adjectives when appropriate. The phrase's neutral register makes it suitable for a wide range of audiences, but specific situations might benefit from alternative expressions like "comprehensive enough" or "thorough enough" to enhance clarity and impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

vast enough

This alternative implies a large scope or scale, similar to "extensive enough".

comprehensive enough

This alternative emphasizes including all or nearly all elements or aspects of something.

massive enough

This alternative suggests a very large quantity or size, emphasizing scale over comprehensiveness.

considerable enough

This alternative indicates a substantial amount or degree, focusing on significance.

widespread enough

This alternative emphasizes broad distribution or prevalence, rather than depth or completeness.

exhaustive enough

This alternative stresses a complete and thorough investigation or coverage, indicating no detail is missed.

intensive enough

This alternative suggests a high degree of concentration or effort, rather than breadth of scope.

thorough enough

This alternative highlights completeness and attention to detail, implying a meticulous approach.

wide enough

This alternative focuses on physical width or range, a more literal interpretation of "extensive".

adequate enough

This alternative means that the thing is good enough for a particular need or purpose.

FAQs

How can I use "extensive enough" in a sentence?

You can use "extensive enough" to describe something that meets a certain level of thoroughness or comprehensiveness. For example, "The data collected was "extensive enough" to draw a conclusion."

What are some alternatives to "extensive enough"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "comprehensive enough", "thorough enough", or "adequate enough".

When is it appropriate to use "extensive enough"?

Use "extensive enough" when you want to express that something is sufficiently broad, detailed, or far-reaching for a specific purpose or requirement.

What is the difference between "extensive enough" and "large enough"?

"Large enough" generally refers to size or quantity, while ""extensive enough"" implies a degree of comprehensiveness or detail. For example, a dataset might be large enough, but not "extensive enough" to cover all relevant variables.