comprehensive enough

USAGE SUMMARY

"comprehensive enough" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are asking if someone or something is thorough and detailed enough to cover the necessary topics. For example: "Is the report comprehensive enough to provide a complete understanding of the situation?".

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Secondly, the (house) foreclosure plan is not comprehensive enough.

Independent

But these proposals are not specific or comprehensive enough.

The New York Times

It's easy yet comprehensive enough for burning basics.

The New York Times

In Bangladesh, BRAC is large enough and comprehensive enough to be akin to a parallel government.

The New York Times

Still comprehensive enough to reach a conclusion that Mitchell, much more than baseball's many self-appointed critics, needed to draw.

The New York Times

The 11-hour "Planet Earth" was comprehensive enough that it needed no particular theme; it just showed us the world.

The New York Times - Arts

The software, though, is comprehensive enough to replace tide books that cost at least that much every year.

The New York Times

Mr. Strauss-Kahn's lawyers argued that the proposed bail package was comprehensive enough to allow his release from Rikers.

The New York Times

However, these models are not comprehensive enough.

Petroleum Science

Economists classify farmers based on landholdings, which is not comprehensive enough for classifying complex farming systems.

Agricultural and Food Economics

The instrument was developed to be comprehensive enough that any user can collect the data easily.

Journal of Safety Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "comprehensive enough" when you need to emphasize a balance between thoroughness and practicality. It suggests that something covers the necessary ground without being excessively detailed.

Common error

Avoid using "comprehensive enough" when a more specific term would be more accurate. Overusing it can dilute its impact. Instead of saying a report is "comprehensive enough", specify that it "covers all key areas" or "includes all relevant data".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "comprehensive enough" primarily functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun, indicating that something possesses a sufficient degree of comprehensiveness. It serves to evaluate whether something meets a certain standard of completeness or thoroughness. According to Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

36%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "comprehensive enough" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase that functions as an adjective phrase to describe something that meets a standard of completeness or thoroughness. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is suitable for use in written English. It appears most frequently in scientific and news media contexts. When using this phrase, it's important to define the scope or criteria against which comprehensiveness is being measured. Alternative phrases, such as "sufficiently thorough" or "adequately detailed", can be used to provide more specific emphasis. While versatile, avoid overusing "comprehensive enough" when a more precise term would enhance clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

thorough enough

A more direct synonym, emphasizing thoroughness.

adequately comprehensive

Reverses the order, but retains the core meaning.

sufficiently thorough

Emphasizes the thoroughness or completeness of something.

complete enough

Underscores the aspect of being whole or entire.

adequately detailed

Focuses on the level of detail provided.

detailed enough

Focuses on the presence of necessary details.

sufficiently extensive

Highlights the breadth or scope of something.

extensive enough

Highlights the range and scale of coverage.

sufficiently inclusive

Emphasizes the inclusion of all relevant elements.

wide-ranging enough

Implies a broad scope, covering many areas.

FAQs

How can I use "comprehensive enough" in a sentence?

You can use "comprehensive enough" to describe whether something is sufficiently thorough or detailed. For example, "Is the training program "comprehensive enough" to prepare employees for their new roles?"

What are some alternatives to "comprehensive enough"?

Alternatives include "sufficiently thorough", "adequately detailed", or "sufficiently extensive" depending on the specific context.

What does it mean when something is described as "not comprehensive enough"?

It means that it lacks the necessary detail or scope to be considered complete or adequate for a particular purpose. It suggests that there are important aspects missing or not fully addressed.

How do I determine if something is "comprehensive enough"?

To determine if something is "comprehensive enough", assess whether it covers all the essential elements and provides sufficient detail to meet the requirements or objectives. Compare it against established standards or expectations.