explained with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "explained with" is correct and can be used in written English.
For example: "The professor explained the concept with a detailed diagram."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Women," he explained, with a snort.

The New Yorker

He explained with a comparison.

The New York Times - Sports

"Only two," Gragnola explained with signs.

The New Yorker

The phenomenon can be explained with H-bonds.

Stanford University

The Edit concept was explained with gentle enthusiasm.

The New York Times

"Blessed virgin Mary," Goldsmith explained with a delighted chuckle.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Right hand on the coffee," he explained with a laugh.

The New York Times

His identical twin, he explained, with even an identical name.

The New York Times - Books

"Zoot was the touchstone," he explained with a frown.

The Guardian - Film

To watch: The federal budget, explained with ten thousand pennies.

The New Yorker

"It's elliptical," she explained, with her trademark confident manner.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "explained with", ensure the 'with' clause clearly identifies the method, tool, or element used for explanation. For instance, "The concept was explained with a visual aid."

Common error

Avoid using "explained with" without a specific and clear explanation of what the explanation relies on. For example, instead of "It was explained with details", specify "It was explained with detailed statistical analysis".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "explained with" functions as a verb phrase followed by a preposition, indicating the means or method used to provide an explanation. It highlights the tool, example, or data used to clarify a concept. Ludwig confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "explained with" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase for specifying the method or tool used in an explanation. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and versatile, fitting various contexts from academic and scientific writing to news reporting. When using "explained with", ensure clarity in the 'with' clause to precisely identify the means of explanation. Common alternatives include "illustrated by" and "clarified by", but "explained with" remains a reliable choice for its directness and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

clarified by

Focuses on the act of making something clearer using a specific element.

illustrated by

Emphasizes the use of examples or visuals to explain a concept.

demonstrated with

Highlights the use of a practical showing of something to explain a concept.

elucidated by

Similar to clarified, but implies a more in-depth explanation.

described using

Highlights that a description is done through specific tools or means.

interpreted through

Focuses on how something is understood based on a specific perspective or method.

shown through

Highlights that something is revealed or made clear through an element or action.

supported by

Highlights the support from evidence or data to give reason of something.

accounted for by

Suggests that a phenomenon or result can be explained or attributed to a specific factor.

defined by

Describes the exact nature or scope of a word or concept.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "explained with" in a sentence?

Use "explained with" to specify what method, example, or evidence is used to clarify a topic. For instance, "The theory was "explained with" a series of experiments".

What are some alternatives to "explained with"?

Alternatives include "illustrated by", "clarified by", or "demonstrated with". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nature of the explanation.

Is it grammatically correct to say "explained with"?

Yes, "explained with" is grammatically correct. It's used to indicate that something is clarified or understood through the use of a specific method, example, or detail.

What's the difference between "explained with" and "explained by"?

"Explained with" emphasizes the tool, method, or example used in the explanation, while "explained by" focuses on the agent or cause that provides the explanation. For example, "The results were "explained with" statistical analysis" versus "The phenomenon was "explained by" the scientist".