explained by

USAGE SUMMARY

"explained by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that something is being explained or clarified. Example: The policy was explained by the manager during the meeting.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This is partly explained by better testing.

The Economist

Mysteries are explained by science.

The New York Times

"It is partly explained by education.

The Guardian

The difference is explained by taxes.

The New York Times

This cannot be reasonably explained by chance".

The New Yorker

Explained by: Being made over again".

SEP

That aspect is explained by….

TechCrunch

Explained by Jason Calcanis here.

TechCrunch

The approach is explained by an example.

Computers & Industrial Engineering

This might be explained by several factors.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

This can be explained by two reasons.

Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "explained by", ensure that the explanation directly and clearly relates to the phenomenon being explained. Clarity is key for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid using "explained by" without providing sufficient evidence or reasoning to support the explanation. A weak explanation can undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "explained by" functions as a causal connector, linking an effect to its cause or reason. It is commonly used to provide explanations or justifications for phenomena, as evidenced by examples in Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "explained by" is a very common and grammatically sound construction used to establish a causal relationship between a phenomenon and its underlying reason. As Ludwig AI explains, it's suitable for various contexts, particularly in science, news, and formal writing. When using "explained by", ensure your explanation is clear and well-supported to maintain credibility. Common errors include providing vague or unsubstantiated explanations. Alternatives like "due to" or "because of" can be used depending on the context. Ensure you use this phrase correctly by following guidance and examples provided.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

because of

A straightforward expression of cause, often used in simple explanations.

due to

Directly indicates causality, emphasizing the reason something happened or exists.

accounted for by

Focuses on providing a reason or justification, often used in analytical contexts.

caused by

Emphasizes the action of causing something, highlighting the origin of an effect.

owing to

Similar to 'due to', but can imply a sense of obligation or consequence.

resulting from

Focuses on the outcome or consequence of a particular cause or event.

attributed to

Suggests assigning a cause or characteristic to something, often implying influence or origin.

stemming from

Indicates an origin or root cause, often used for abstract or complex issues.

motivated by

Highlights the underlying reasons or incentives driving an action or decision.

clarified by

Highlights the process of making something clearer through explanation or evidence.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "explained by" in a sentence?

Use "explained by" to clearly link a phenomenon or observation to its cause or reason. For instance, "The increase in sales was "explained by" the new marketing campaign".

What are some alternatives to using "explained by"?

You can use alternatives such as "due to", "because of", or "attributed to" depending on the context. For example, instead of "The error was "explained by" a software bug", you could say "The error was "due to" a software bug".

Is it always necessary to provide an explanation after using "explained by"?

Yes, it's essential to provide a clear and logical explanation after using "explained by" to ensure the statement is meaningful and well-supported. Without it, the sentence may lack clarity and credibility.

What is the difference between "explained by" and "illustrated by"?

"Explained by" indicates a cause-and-effect relationship, providing a reason for something, while "illustrated by" offers examples or visual representations to clarify a concept. For example, "The theory is "explained by" quantum mechanics" versus "The theory is "illustrated by" the double-slit experiment".