excluded both

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "excluded both" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that two specific items or individuals are not included in a particular context or situation. Example: "The committee's decision excluded both candidates from the final selection process."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Of the top 40 shows, 15 hired no women directors; 10 hired no minority directors, and 6 excluded both women and minority directors, the report said.

The New York Times - Arts

For example, initial plans for Masdar excluded both aluminum and conventional concrete because the production of those materials generates high levels of carbon emissions, which warm the planet.

The New York Times

The DNA tests were completed in August, 2008, and they excluded both White and Winslow as the source of the semen at the crime scene.

The New Yorker

Thompson ingeniously suggests that Whitehouse shared much with her punk contemporaries – both were socially excluded, both rebelled against establishment values they detested.

The Guardian - Books

Excluded both from the military revolution and the privilege of their wealthy Cairo connections, they long for Britain – which has no further use for them.

The Guardian - Books

Labor protections drafted in the New Deal specifically excluded both groups of workers, who remain highly vulnerable to exploitation.

The New York Times

Blacks were excluded both from their histories, and from their understanding of how America had been made.

The Economist

In "Jim," his 1971 standing-in-the-shadow-of-negritude biography of the football great Jim Brown, the white writer-director James Toback wrote, "If there were a black boy anywhere in America whose vision of boyhood excluded both sports and entertainment, he was a freak, a mutation of consciousness".

The New York Times

The data on the 174 black and Hispanic children in the study were excluded, both because the sample size was too small to analyze separately and because a homogenous population made it easier to separate out the effects of employment, Dr. Brooks-Gunn said.

The New York Times

The new republic excluded both Geneva, which was annexed to France (April 1798), and the three provinces of Valtellina, Chiavenna, and Bormio, which went to the Italian Cisalpine Republic.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The clinical course and laboratory/imaging results excluded both the infectious and the ischemic hypotheses.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "excluded both", ensure the context clearly defines the two items being excluded to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "excluded both" when referring to a single item. It's designed for dual exclusions. For single items, use "excluded". For example, instead of saying "The policy excluded both the applicant", say "The policy excluded the applicant".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "excluded both" functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of deliberately omitting two specific items or entities from a particular context. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

54%

News & Media

39%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "excluded both" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that signifies the deliberate omission of two distinct items from a given situation, as verified by Ludwig AI. It functions as a verb phrase with a neutral register, making it suitable for diverse contexts including science, news, and general writing. To enhance clarity, ensure the items being excluded are clearly defined. Common errors involve misusing the phrase with singular nouns. Alternatives such as "omitted both" or "left out both" can provide similar meaning while varying the tone. The analysis reveals that "excluded both" serves to clearly specify and emphasize a dual exclusion in academic, scientific, and general contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Omitted both

Focuses on the act of leaving something out, subtly shifting from active exclusion to passive omission.

Left out both

Emphasizes the action of not including something, often implying a deliberate choice.

Precluded both

Suggests a prevention or making something impossible, adding a stronger sense of obstruction.

Eliminated both

Highlights the removal of something, implying a definitive act of getting rid of it.

Excepted both

Indicates that something is not subject to a general rule or statement, emphasizing a specific exception.

Disregarded both

Conveys a sense of ignoring or paying no attention to something, focusing on a lack of consideration.

Rejected both

Implies a refusal to accept something, emphasizing a decision against it.

Bypassed both

Suggests going around or avoiding something, often to achieve a goal more quickly.

Ignored both

Stresses a deliberate act of overlooking or disregarding, emphasizing a conscious choice not to acknowledge.

Discounted both

Highlights the act of reducing importance or value, indicating a lower priority or relevance.

FAQs

How can I use "excluded both" in a sentence?

Use "excluded both" to indicate that two specific items or individuals are not included in a particular situation. For example, "The study "excluded both" men and women over the age of 65".

What can I say instead of "excluded both"?

You can use alternatives like "omitted both", "left out both", or "rejected both" depending on the context. For instance, "The committee "omitted both" candidates from the final list".

Is it better to say "excluded both X and Y" or "excluded X and Y"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "excluded both X and Y" emphasizes that two specific items are being excluded. "Excluded X and Y" is more concise but may lack the same emphasis. For example, "The guidelines "excluded both" caffeine and alcohol" places more stress on the dual exclusion than "The guidelines excluded caffeine and alcohol".

What's the difference between "excluded both" and "included neither"?

"Excluded both" means that two specific items were deliberately left out, while "included neither" means that neither of the two items was added. They convey similar meanings but have different emphases. For example, "The report "excluded both" positive and negative feedback", versus "The report "included neither" positive nor negative feedback".