even remotely analogous

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "even remotely analogous" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express that two things are not similar at all, even in a very slight or distant way. Example: "The two situations are not even remotely analogous; one involves a financial crisis while the other is a personal relationship issue."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

"We are sure you will understand that we cannot welcome anything even remotely analogous in Jammu and Kashmir".

Independent

"There are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God's plan for marriage and family," the document said, asserting repeatedly that marriage should be reserved for heterosexual couples.

The New York Times

'One obvious shortcoming in these claims is that plaintiffs can point to no liability of a 'private individual' even remotely analogous to that which they are asserting against the United States.

Cornell University

"There are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God's plan for marriage and family," the document said instead.

The Washington Post

Although the final document defends the dignity of homosexual people against "unjust discrimination," it also quotes an earlier Vatican document stating that "there are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God's plans for marriage and family".

Independent

Yes, the names are very similar, but their uses are not even remotely analogous.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Not even remotely.

The New York Times

Or even remotely proportionate.

The Guardian - Sport

"Not even remotely realistic".

The New York Times

Even remotely like them.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

He did not, even remotely, "sound black".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "even remotely analogous" when you want to strongly emphasize the lack of any significant similarity between two things. It's more emphatic than simply saying something is 'not analogous'.

Common error

Avoid using "even remotely analogous" when a slight similarity exists. Using it in such cases can come across as hyperbolic and weaken your argument. Choose a less emphatic phrase if there's any arguable connection.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "even remotely analogous" functions as an intensifier, emphasizing the absence of even a slight similarity between two or more items. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and usable in written English. It modifies the adjective "analogous", stressing the lack of comparability.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

30%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Science

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "even remotely analogous" serves to emphatically deny any similarity between two subjects, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While grammatically correct and appearing in reputable sources like The New York Times and The Guardian, it is not exceedingly common. Its usage is most prevalent in news and academic contexts. When writing, consider whether a slight similarity exists before using this phrase to avoid overstatement. Alternatives such as "not even distantly similar" or "not remotely comparable" offer similar meanings with slightly different nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not even distantly similar

Emphasizes the lack of similarity, even at a conceptual distance.

not remotely comparable

Highlights the absence of a basis for comparison.

not by any stretch of the imagination alike

Stresses that any comparison requires a significant imaginative leap.

not akin in any way

Indicates a complete absence of kinship or resemblance.

bears no resemblance whatsoever

Underscores the total lack of similarity in appearance or nature.

hardly analogous at all

Suggests a minimal degree of analogy that is almost negligible.

not in the same ballpark

Informally expresses that the subjects being compared are vastly different.

completely dissimilar

States a full absence of similarity, highlighting the differences between the two elements.

entirely unalike

Stresses the completeness of the dissimilarity.

not related in the slightest

Indicates that there is no connection between the subjects under consideration.

FAQs

How can I use "even remotely analogous" in a sentence?

You can use "even remotely analogous" to emphasize the lack of similarity between two things. For example: "The current economic situation is not "even remotely analogous" to the Great Depression."

What phrases are similar to "even remotely analogous"?

Alternatives include "not even distantly similar", "not remotely comparable", or "bears no resemblance whatsoever", depending on the desired emphasis.

When is it appropriate to use "even remotely analogous"?

Use "even remotely analogous" when you want to highlight that two things are so different that any comparison is strained or inaccurate. It's useful when dispelling potential misconceptions about their similarity.

Is "even remotely analogous" formal or informal?

The phrase "even remotely analogous" can be used in both formal and informal contexts, although it leans towards a more formal tone due to the use of "analogous". Simpler alternatives might be preferred in very informal settings.