not remotely comparable

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not remotely comparable" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to emphasize that two things are so different that they cannot be compared at all. Example: "The two paintings are from entirely different eras and styles; they are not remotely comparable."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

The current situation was not remotely comparable," continues the note for the record.

The Guardian

The two are not remotely comparable of course, but after Brexit Britain will be a third country like Turkey".

The Guardian

"The nature of the threat we face today is not remotely comparable to what was around then". Intercepting intelligence of terrorist plans is becoming ever more difficult.

The Guardian

It represents, at worst, a small human failing, not remotely comparable by any standard of iniquity to the criminal corruption those filmmakers imputed to Dewey.

The New York Times - Books

His side is not remotely comparable to Wenger's in talent but they had a morale in the tie that would be a match for anyone.

The Guardian - Sport

He said being photographed on the beach in Cornwall against his wishes was not remotely comparable to the Miliband/Mail case.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

She emphasized that her suffering wasn't remotely comparable to that of someone who is incarcerated.

The New Yorker

"Not remotely" (like him).

The New Yorker

But in terms of historical importance, the election of a woman to the nation's highest political office would not remotely be comparable, domestically or internationally, to the election of an African-American.

Huffington Post

A romantic relationship between two consenting adults is not even remotely comparable to the sexual abuse of a minor.

Huffington Post

"We have not seen anything remotely comparable to this since 1970".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "not remotely comparable", ensure that the context clearly establishes what two elements are being contrasted. This helps prevent ambiguity and reinforces the significance of the distinction.

Common error

Avoid using "not remotely comparable" when the items being compared have some minor similarities. This phrase is most effective when highlighting a profound, almost unbridgeable gap between the subjects.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not remotely comparable" functions as an intensifier modifying the adjective "comparable". Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use. It serves to negate any perceived similarity between two distinct entities, emphasizing a significant disparity.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

80%

Encyclopedias

7%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Science

3%

Academia

3%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not remotely comparable" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase for emphasizing substantial differences between two subjects. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and demonstrates its prevalence in varied contexts, especially News & Media. While versatile, it is best used when highlighting truly significant disparities. Alternatives like "worlds apart" or "completely dissimilar" offer similar emphasis. When using this phrase, it's beneficial to provide context that clearly defines what is being compared to avoid ambiguity. Finally, reserve "not remotely comparable" for scenarios where differences are substantial, avoiding its use for minor distinctions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

completely dissimilar

Directly states that there is no similarity between the items being compared.

bears no comparison

Indicates that a comparison is inappropriate due to the vast differences.

worlds apart

Emphasizes the vast difference between two things, highlighting their complete dissimilarity.

entirely different

Focuses on the complete divergence in nature or characteristics.

poles apart

Uses a metaphor to describe extreme opposition or difference.

distinctly unalike

Highlights the clear and obvious differences between two subjects.

hardly similar

Emphasizes the lack of similarity, focusing on how little resemblance exists.

not in the same league

Suggests a significant difference in quality or status, implying one is far superior or inferior.

dissimilar in every aspect

Stresses that every single feature or characteristic differs between the items.

nowhere near equivalent

Highlights that the two items or situations are not close in value or status.

FAQs

How can I use "not remotely comparable" in a sentence?

You can use "not remotely comparable" to emphasize a stark difference between two things. For example: "The scale of the two projects is "not remotely comparable"; one is a small local initiative, while the other is a national endeavor."

What does "not remotely comparable" mean?

"Not remotely comparable" means that two things are so different that they cannot be reasonably compared. It emphasizes a significant disparity between them.

What are some alternatives to "not remotely comparable"?

Some alternatives include "hardly similar", "not in the same league", or "worlds apart". Each of these phrases conveys a strong sense of dissimilarity.

Is it appropriate to use "not remotely comparable" in formal writing?

Yes, "not remotely comparable" is appropriate for formal writing, especially when you need to emphasize a critical distinction. However, ensure that the tone remains professional and objective.