estimated at

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "estimated at" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to describe an approximate figure, such as in the sentence, "The total cost of the project is estimated at $500,000."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Estimated at $150 a pop.

The New York Times

Losses estimated at $2 billion.

The New York Times

Unemployment is estimated at 20% and rising.

The Economist

Fuel economy is estimated at 26 m.p.g.

The New York Times

Spending was estimated at almost $40 million.

The New York Times

It is estimated at around $30 million.

The New York Times - Arts

Reserves were estimated at 600 million bbl.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The cost was estimated at €5.5m ($7.43m).

The Economist

The cost is estimated at $90 million.

The New York Times

Mileage is estimated at 25 m.p.g.

The New York Times

Population is estimated at over 3 million.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "estimated at", consider the context and choose a verb that accurately reflects the method of estimation, such as 'forecasted' for future projections or 'evaluated' for formal assessments.

Common error

Be cautious when using "estimated at" in contexts requiring precise figures. Always acknowledge the possibility of error or variation in the estimate to maintain transparency and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "estimated at" functions as a predicate adjective, modifying a noun by providing an approximate value or quantity. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a standard and acceptable way to express an approximation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Wiki

33%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "estimated at" is a versatile phrase used to convey an approximate value or quantity. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread acceptance. It functions as a predicate adjective, commonly found in neutral registers and across diverse contexts like News & Media, Encyclopedias, Academia, and Wiki. While generally interchangeable with alternatives like "forecasted at" and "approximated at", it's essential to consider the specific context and desired level of precision when making a choice. Remember to avoid overstating certainty and acknowledge potential variations when using this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

forecasted at

This alternative implies a prediction based on available data, shifting the focus from a general estimate to a projected figure.

evaluated at

This suggests a more formal or rigorous assessment process has been used to determine the value or quantity.

approximated at

This highlights the inexact nature of the figure, emphasizing it's a close but not precise calculation.

gauged at

Implies an assessment made using a specific tool or method, adding a layer of measurement to the estimation.

budgeted at

This alternative focuses on the allocation of funds, indicating the figure is part of a financial plan.

calculated at

Suggests that the amount was derived through the use of mathematical or logical means.

reckoned at

Implies a rough calculation or judgment, often based on past experience or intuition.

assessed to be

This is a more formal way of saying something has been evaluated, often by an expert or authority.

thought to be

Conveys a sense of belief or opinion, rather than a concrete calculation or assessment.

projected to be

This suggests the figure is based on current trends and is expected to reach a certain level in the future.

FAQs

How to use "estimated at" in a sentence?

The phrase "estimated at" is used to indicate an approximate value or quantity. For example, "The project cost is "estimated at" $1 million."

What can I say instead of "estimated at"?

You can use alternatives like "forecasted at", "approximated at", or "evaluated at" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "estimated at" or "estimated to be"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "estimated at" is more concise and often preferred. "Estimated to be" might be used when you want to emphasize the process of estimation, but they are largely interchangeable.

What's the difference between "estimated at" and "projected at"?

"Estimated at" generally refers to a current or past value, while "projected at" is used for future values based on current trends. Thus, projected at implies a forecast, while estimated at implies a general approximation.