equated to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equated to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the relationship or equivalence between two concepts, values, or items. Example: "In this study, the success rate was equated to the number of participants who completed the program."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The frequency equation is a 2 x 2 determinant equated to zero.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

The frequency equations of stepped beams were expressed as fourth order determinant equated to zero.

International Journal of Mechanical Sciences

Lower scores equated to better function.

The Guardian

For me that equated to 2,860 calories per day.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

United's income at the same rate equated to 324.8m euros.

Independent

Which again, equated to a full-blown, year-long affair.

Independent

The 15 absences, recorded on 11 June, equated to an absence rate of 10.6%.

The Guardian

The "receivables" of $330m equated to four and a half months' revenues.

The Guardian - Business

The original stated that $2 trillion a year equated to $6m per day.

The Guardian - Opinion

That equated to 9.47 seconds: the exact difference between their two personal bests.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

This equated to equating to €1.3 million profit.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "equated to", ensure that the relationship between the two elements is clearly established and logical. Avoid using it in situations where the connection is weak or unclear.

Common error

Avoid using "equated to" when describing subjective or abstract concepts that cannot be directly quantified or compared. For instance, avoid saying "Happiness is equated to wealth"; instead, consider using "associated with" or "linked to".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equated to" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating equivalence or correspondence between two entities. It establishes a relationship where one thing is considered to be the same as or directly comparable to another. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Academia

4%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "equated to" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to establish equivalence or direct correspondence between two entities. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage across various domains, including news, science, and business. While generally neutral in register, it's crucial to ensure a clear and logical connection between the elements being equated. Alternatives such as "equal to", "comparable to", and "equivalent to" can be used depending on the specific context. Avoid its misuse in abstract or unquantifiable scenarios to maintain clarity and precision in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

corresponded to

Expresses a similar idea of matching or aligning with something else, implying a direct relationship.

amounted to

Focuses on the total or resulting value, often used with numerical or quantitative contexts.

was equal to

A more direct and mathematically precise way of stating equivalence.

was considered as

Highlights the perceived or judged equivalence rather than a factual one.

was regarded as

Similar to "was considered as", but emphasizes a more formal or established viewpoint.

is synonymous with

Implies a complete interchangeability of meaning, more suitable for abstract concepts.

can be seen as

Offers an alternative interpretation or understanding of a concept or situation.

is comparable to

Suggests similarity for the purposes of analysis or comparison.

was the same as

Indicates a complete identity in nature, quality, or quantity.

represented

Implies that something stood for or symbolized something else.

FAQs

How can I use "equated to" in a sentence?

You can use "equated to" to show that two things are considered equal or equivalent. For example: "In this study, success was "equated to" the number of participants who completed the program."

What can I say instead of "equated to"?

You can use alternatives like "equal to", "comparable to", or "equivalent to" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "equated to" or "equated with"?

"Equated to" and "equated with" can be used, but ""equated to"" is more common when showing numerical or quantifiable equivalence. "Equated with" often implies a more abstract connection.

What's the difference between "equated to" and "associated with"?

"Equated to" implies a direct equivalence or equality, while "associated with" suggests a correlation or connection that isn't necessarily equal. The former is stronger and more definite.