equal validity

USAGE SUMMARY

"equal validity" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use it as an adjective, for example, "The researchers concluded that both studies had equal validity," or as a noun, "The debate over which study had more validity was pointless, as both had equal validity."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

The epistemic relativist, as Paul Boghossian in developing his trenchant criticisms of relativism points out, is committed to a "doctrine of equal validity", the view that "there are many radically different, incompatible, yet, 'equally valid' ways of knowing the world, with science being just one of them" (Boghossian 2006a: 2006a

SEP

Can two opposing beliefs have equal validity?

The Guardian

"That both sides can now argue with equal passion and equal validity what he meant?

The Washington Post

Neither he nor Lorentz, however, ascribed equal validity to the times kept by the different sets of clocks.

The New York Times - Science

"This bill gives equal validity to relationships between same-sex couples as heterosexual ones and proves that the love of two people will overcome everything".

The Guardian

His central metaphor is also so vague as to be meaningless: you could apply it with equal validity to Nazism, communism or capitalist consumerism.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

28 human-written examples

All perspectives, in that formulation, have equal validity--we simply see the flag differently.

Huffington Post

However, a good description of a measurement instrument not necessarily equals validity of the measurement instrument.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

When both choices seem equal in validity, the likelihood of one being far superior to the other is almost zero.

Forbes

A = ID is not scientific but has been proposed to counter evolution based on false claims, B = ID is religious doctrine consistent with creationism, C = no opinion, D = ID is a scientific alternative to evolution and of equal scientific validity among scientists, and E = ID is a scientific theory about the origin and evolution of life on Earth.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Only 8% of the faculty versus 48% of the students had either no opinion about ID, considered it a scientific alternative to evolution and of equal scientific validity among scientists, or thought of ID as a scientific theory about the origin of life on Earth (combined values choices C + D + E; Fig. 2).

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "equal validity", ensure that you are comparing two or more distinct entities or claims, and that you can clearly justify why they possess a similar level of validity.

Common error

Avoid stating that two things have "equal validity" without providing evidence or reasoning. Unsupported assertions of equal validity can weaken your argument and undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equal validity" primarily functions as a noun phrase, often used as a subject complement or object of a preposition. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability across various contexts. It serves to describe a state where multiple entities or claims possess a similar level of justification or truth.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

41%

News & Media

37%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "equal validity" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, predominantly in scientific, news, and academic contexts. Ludwig AI validates its proper use. The phrase serves to assert or imply that different entities, claims or perspectives hold similar levels of justification or truth. While it requires careful consideration to ensure the claim is well-supported, mastering its use can add precision to your writing, avoiding the common error of assuming equivalence without proper backing. Alternative expressions like "equivalent validity" or "comparable validity" offer nuanced ways to convey a similar message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equivalent validity

Replaces 'equal' with 'equivalent', suggesting a similar degree of validity.

comparable validity

Substitutes 'equal' with 'comparable', implying the validity is similar but not necessarily identical.

same level of validity

Uses a longer phrase to express the idea of validity being at the same level or degree.

equivalent justification

Focuses on the 'justification' aspect of validity, suggesting the arguments or reasons are equally sound.

similar degree of truth

Highlights the 'truth' component, indicating both claims or perspectives have a comparable level of accuracy.

equal weight

Emphasizes that both items should be given the same consideration or importance.

comparable merit

Highlights the comparable value or quality between two things.

same degree of accuracy

Focuses specifically on the accuracy of two items, signifying a similar degree of correctness.

interchangeable validity

Implies both have a validity that allows them to be switched or used in place of each other.

shared validity

Highlights that both have a validity in common.

FAQs

How can I use "equal validity" in a sentence?

You can use "equal validity" to compare two or more claims, perspectives, or methods. For example: "Both theories have "equal validity" in explaining this phenomenon."

What's a good alternative to "equal validity"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "equivalent validity", "comparable validity", or "same level of validity".

Is it always appropriate to claim "equal validity"?

No, claiming "equal validity" requires careful consideration and justification. Ensure that you can support your claim with evidence and logical reasoning before asserting that two things have similar validity.

What is the difference between "equal validity" and "relative validity"?

"Equal validity" implies that two or more things have a similar level of validity. "Relative validity", on the other hand, suggests that the validity of something depends on the context or perspective.