comparable validity

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "comparable validity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to research, testing, or measurement where you want to discuss the degree to which two or more methods or instruments yield similar results. Example: "The study aimed to assess the comparable validity of the new assessment tool against the established standard."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

In addition, our study results showed comparable validity with a web-based triage system, which may encourage many Japanese hospitals with limited web connectivity due to personal information protection regulation to use a scientifically validated triage system.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

The SAQ-UK has comparable validity to the SAQ-US [ 54], and it has been used in studies of CABG [ 59].

BMC Nursing

This version has been proposed as a possible substitute for the original BHS with comparable validity by Aish and Wasserman [ 44].

BMC Psychiatry

Another study found comparable validity between the PA measure of the Women's Health Initiative PA questionnaire (WHI) and the PAR [ 14].

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Although post-surgical swelling has a less homogeneous composition than lymphedema, the evaluation of ECF appears to be of comparable validity for both conditions.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

If such an instrument had comparable validity (in terms of mortality and disability prediction), it might be easier to implement in primary care practice since it would not require handgrip strength assessment.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Based on the comparative validity findings, we conclude despite slight group differences, overall the internal and external predictive validity of CBC was comparable between African-Americans and Whites.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Experimental and control group subjects who remain at T2 are compared on their baseline characteristics to determine whether the groups remain comparable (internal validity).

BMC Geriatrics

The mean values of the other two factors were comparable (face validity: M = 4.14, SD = 0.81; interestingness: M = 4.08, SD = 1.03), both suggesting a moderate tendency towards positivity.

Language Testing in Asia

The use of the Internet raises a separate generalizability concern, but a growing literature suggests comparable reliability, internal validity, and external validity with use of the Internet as compared to conventional modes of data collection [ 21].

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Depressive symptoms experienced in the last week were assessed using an 8-item version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale.[ 13] The 8-item version of the CES-D scale used in the HRS and ELSA has comparable reliability and validity to the widely used and validated 20-item CES-D Scale.[ 13, 14].

BMC Geriatrics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing the validity of different instruments or methods, clearly define the criteria or standards against which validity is being assessed to ensure the comparison is meaningful.

Common error

Avoid implying absolute equivalence when using "comparable validity". It suggests a high degree of similarity, but not necessarily perfect alignment. Be precise about the extent of the similarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "comparable validity" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun. It signifies that the validity of one thing is similar or equivalent to the validity of another. This is reflected in the examples Ludwig provides, where the phrase is used to compare the validity of different tests, questionnaires, or methods.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "comparable validity" is a term used to describe the similarity in validity between two or more measurement instruments or methods. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct and typically used in formal, scientific contexts. While not exceedingly common, it effectively communicates that different approaches yield similar levels of accuracy or effectiveness. When employing this phrase, ensure you clearly define the criteria used to assess validity to provide a meaningful comparison. Alternatives such as "similar validity" or "equivalent validity" can be used depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

similar validity

Replaces "comparable" with "similar", emphasizing the likeness in validity.

equivalent validity

Substitutes "comparable" with "equivalent", suggesting an equal level of validity.

analogous validity

Replaces "comparable" with "analogous", indicating a similarity in some respects.

matching validity

Uses "matching" instead of "comparable", highlighting the correspondence between validities.

corresponding validity

Employs "corresponding" instead of "comparable", suggesting a parallel in validity.

commensurate validity

Replaces "comparable" with "commensurate", implying a proportional level of validity.

relative validity

Switches to "relative", focusing on the validity in relation to another measure.

consistent validity

Uses "consistent" to convey a stable and similar validity across different contexts.

uniform validity

Replaces "comparable" with "uniform", emphasizing a consistent level of validity.

parallel validity

Employs "parallel" to indicate the validities run alongside each other with similar characteristics.

FAQs

How is "comparable validity" used in research?

In research, "comparable validity" is used to describe when two or more measurement instruments or methods yield similar results when measuring the same construct. This suggests that they are equally effective or accurate in their measurement.

What does it mean for two tests to have "comparable validity"?

When two tests have "comparable validity", it means that they demonstrate a similar degree of accuracy and consistency in measuring what they are intended to measure. This does not necessarily mean they are identical, but that their validity is roughly equivalent.

Which is more appropriate, "similar validity" or "comparable validity"?

Both "comparable validity" and "similar validity" are appropriate, but "comparable validity" is slightly more formal and often used in academic or research contexts. The choice depends on the context and desired level of formality.

In what contexts might I use the term "comparable validity"?

You might use "comparable validity" in discussing the results of different tests, assessments, or measurement tools. For example, when a new test is developed, researchers often assess its validity and compare it to that of existing, established measures to see if they have "comparable validity".