enough proof

USAGE SUMMARY

"enough proof" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to a degree of proof that is satisfactory. For example, "The new evidence was enough proof to convict the accused of the crime."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Isn't that enough proof?

The New York Times

That's enough proof of endurance, managing budgets and organisation".

Independent

"We don't have enough proof to ban this group".

The New York Times

"I haven't seen enough proof that it is Osama bin Laden.

The New York Times

"We have enough proof of Tymoshenko's involvement in this crime," Kuzmin said.

The Guardian

"I hope that's enough proof of vulnerability for him," says Hayley.

The Guardian

"There will be less of a tendency to charge when maybe there is not enough proof".

The New York Times

The lawyer said they were confident there was not enough proof to find his client guilty.

The New York Times

"I hope these papers are enough proof the home is mine.

The New York Times

The prosecutors believe they have enough proof to have Mr Berlusconi indicted without a pre-trial hearing.

The Economist

"We are convinced now that there will not be enough proof to find him guilty," Mr. Elfassy said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "enough proof", ensure the context clearly defines what constitutes "enough" in the given situation. This helps avoid ambiguity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "enough proof" when the evidence is weak or circumstantial. Overstating the strength of evidence can undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "enough proof" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "enough" modifies the noun "proof". It describes a state where the quantity or quality of the proof is sufficient to meet a certain threshold. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "enough proof" is a commonly used and grammatically correct phrase that signifies sufficient evidence to support a claim. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is versatile and appears frequently in news and media. While "enough proof" can be used in various contexts, it's essential to ensure that the context clearly defines what constitutes "enough" to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "sufficient evidence" or "adequate evidence" can be used for variety, but "enough proof" remains a clear and effective choice in many situations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficient evidence

Replaces "enough" with "sufficient", emphasizing the adequacy of the evidence.

adequate evidence

Uses "adequate" instead of "enough", highlighting the suitability of the evidence.

conclusive evidence

Indicates that the evidence is decisive and leaves no room for doubt.

ample evidence

Suggests a plentiful amount of evidence is available.

convincing evidence

Focuses on the persuasive power of the evidence.

sufficient grounds

Shifts the focus to the justification provided by the evidence.

reasonable grounds

Suggests a rational basis supported by the evidence.

a preponderance of evidence

A legal term indicating that the evidence is more convincing than the opposing evidence.

a wealth of evidence

Highlights the abundance of evidence available.

a body of evidence

Emphasizes the collective nature and substantiality of the evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "enough proof" in a sentence?

You can use "enough proof" to express that there is sufficient evidence to support a claim. For example, "The prosecution presented "enough proof" to convict the defendant."

What can I say instead of "enough proof"?

You can use alternatives like "sufficient evidence", "adequate evidence", or "conclusive evidence" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "enough proof" or "enough evidence"?

Both ""enough proof"" and "enough evidence" are correct. "Proof" often implies a higher degree of certainty compared to "evidence".

What's the difference between "enough proof" and "sufficient evidence"?

While largely interchangeable, "sufficient evidence" may be preferred in formal or legal contexts, while ""enough proof"" is common in general usage.