eliminated by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "eliminated by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been removed or eradicated by a specific agent or factor. Example: "The error was eliminated by implementing a new software update."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Some are eliminated by logistics.

The New York Times - Sports

The cap would be eliminated by 2003.

The New York Times

They were eliminated by a terrible England.

The Guardian - Sport

The U.S. had been eliminated by Brazil on July 4th.

The New Yorker

(The budget surplus will have been eliminated by tax cuts).

The New York Times

Many wines are never tasted; they are eliminated by smell.

The New York Times

Bright Luos were eliminated by the Kenyatta government".

The New Yorker

The Royals were then eliminated by Fort Wayne.

The New York Times - Sports

It was not eliminated by the Clinton administration.

The New York Times

Babies were eliminated by bashing their heads against tree trunks.

The New Yorker

The WHO wants the disease eliminated by 2020.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "eliminated by", ensure the subject clearly identifies what was removed and the agent or cause of removal. For example, "The risk was eliminated by the new safety protocols" is clearer than "The risk was eliminated."

Common error

Avoid using "eliminated by" without specifying the agent or factor causing the elimination. A sentence like "Errors were eliminated" lacks clarity; instead, specify: "Errors were eliminated by the debugging process".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "eliminated by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject has been removed or negated as a result of an action or agent. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage. Examples show this across various contexts from news to science.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

38%

News & Media

36%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "eliminated by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction to indicate that something has been removed or eradicated by a particular agent. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is widely accepted and versatile, fitting within various contexts ranging from scientific publications to news reports. When crafting your sentences, ensure clarity by specifying the agent responsible for the elimination. Remember to use alternatives like "removed by" or "eradicated by" to diversify your writing while maintaining precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

removed by

Replaces "eliminated" with "removed", a direct synonym, maintaining the passive voice.

eradicated by

Substitutes "eliminated" with "eradicated", suggesting complete removal, with passive construction.

taken out by

Uses a more informal phrasal verb "taken out" instead of "eliminated", with passive construction.

suppressed by

Employs "suppressed" to mean kept from developing or being expressed, in a passive construction.

defeated by

Implies being overcome or beaten by something, changing the nuance slightly.

stopped by

Replaces "eliminated" with "stopped", indicating the action was prevented, with passive construction.

nullified by

Indicates something made ineffective or invalid, a more formal alternative.

invalidated by

Suggests something was made no longer valid or acceptable.

neutralized by

Emphasizes rendering something harmless or ineffective.

offset by

Highlights counteracting or balancing the effects.

FAQs

How can I use "eliminated by" in a sentence?

Use "eliminated by" to show that something was removed or eradicated by a specific action or entity. For instance, "The bugs were "eliminated by" the new patch", illustrating a cause-and-effect relationship.

What are some alternatives to "eliminated by"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "removed by", "eradicated by", or "taken out by" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it better to use "eliminated by" or "eliminated through"?

"Eliminated by" specifies the agent that caused the elimination, while "eliminated through" emphasizes the method or process used. Choose the phrase that best fits the specific relationship you want to highlight in your sentence. For example, ""eliminated by" improved security measures" versus "eliminated through rigorous testing".

What's the difference between "eliminated by" and "prevented by"?

"Eliminated by" means something was already present and then removed, while "prevented by" means something was stopped from happening in the first place. "The problem was "eliminated by" the update" (problem existed), but "The problem was "prevented by" careful planning" (problem never occurred).