removed by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "removed by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been taken away or eliminated by a specific agent or action. Example: "The outdated information was removed by the editor before publication."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Whey is removed by draining or dipping.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Robbins was dismantled and removed by contractors.

The New York Times

The laptop was removed by halftime.

The New York Times - Sports

No illegal drugs were removed by police.

The Guardian

They were duly removed by the dustmen.

The Guardian - Arts

Product was removed by in situ stripping.

Bioresource Technology

Yeast cells were then removed by centrifugation.

AMB Express

The precipitate was removed by centrifugation.

Botanical Studies

Residual plant debris was removed by centrifugation.

Rice

Suspended matter can be removed by filtration.

Applied Water Science

Water was removed by azeotropic distillation.

EJNMMI Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "removed by", ensure the agent or method responsible for the removal is clearly stated to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid overuse of the passive voice when using "removed by". Actively describe who or what did the removing to make your writing more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The error was removed by the editor", write "The editor removed the error".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "removed by" primarily functions as part of a passive construction in English grammar. Ludwig AI provides numerous examples showing its role in indicating how an object or substance is acted upon, specifically in its removal by an agent or process.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

66%

News & Media

19%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "removed by" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that something has been taken away or eliminated by a specific action or agent. As Ludwig AI confirms, its primary function is within passive constructions, and its communicative purpose is to show how an object or substance was acted upon. This phrase is versatile, appearing in various contexts, notably science and news. When writing, it's best to clearly state the agent or method responsible for the removal to avoid ambiguity and be mindful of overuse of the passive voice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

taken away by

Emphasizes the physical act of something being taken from a place or situation.

eliminated by

Highlights the complete removal or eradication of something, often suggesting a more thorough process.

extracted by

Focuses on the process of taking something out from a mixture, source, or container.

cleared by

Suggests that something has been freed from obstacles or unwanted elements by some action.

excised by

Implies surgical or precise removal, often in a medical or scientific context.

displaced by

Indicates the shifting or replacing of one thing with another through external influence.

withdrawn by

Highlights the act of pulling something back or away from a position or situation.

expelled by

Suggests a forceful ejection or removal from a place or system.

separated by

Emphasizes the action of distinguishing and moving apart different elements.

drained by

Describes the process of removing liquid or other substances to empty something.

FAQs

How can I use "removed by" in a sentence?

The phrase "removed by" is used to indicate that something has been taken away or eliminated by a specific agent or action. For example: "The outdated information was removed by the editor before publication".

What are some alternatives to "removed by"?

You can use alternatives like "taken away by", "eliminated by", or "extracted by" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "removed by" or "eliminated by"?

Both "removed by" and "eliminated by" are correct, but "eliminated by" implies a more complete or thorough removal. The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What does "removed by centrifugation" mean?

"Removed by centrifugation" means that a substance or component was separated and taken out of a mixture using the process of centrifugation, which involves spinning the mixture at high speed to separate components based on density.