due to cost

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "due to cost" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to explain a reason for a decision or action that is influenced by financial considerations. Example: "The project was canceled due to cost overruns that exceeded the budget."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

She is presently uninsured due to cost.

The Economist

The new Trident replacement is due to cost between £30-£40bn £30-£40bn

The Guardian

It is due to cost 24 billion yuan and open in five years.

The Economist

Milloy was due to cost the Patriots at least $5.25 million against the salary cap this season.

The New York Times - Sports

Around the country, some similar projects have folded or stalled due to cost.

The New York Times

The crisis over the CAP Futures programme, which was originally due to cost £102m, has angered farmers.

The Guardian

The next stage of the project is due to cost £44m, with private companies providing half of that.

Independent

Rest of the competition is VM based they reset the environment due to cost structure.

TechCrunch

savings at the low end of our expectations due to cost savings.

TechCrunch

The work is due to cost £420,000 and is part of an £8m repair programme.

BBC

Inhibitors have attracted great attention due to cost effectiveness and simplicity of the methods.

Measurement

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "due to cost", ensure the context clearly establishes a causal relationship where cost is the primary reason for the outcome or decision. For example, "The project's scope was reduced due to cost overruns."

Common error

Avoid using "due to cost" as the subject of a sentence. It's a causal phrase, not a noun. Instead of saying "Due to cost was the reason", say "The reason was due to cost".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "due to cost" functions as an adverbial phrase that modifies a verb or clause by providing the reason or cause for an action or situation. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage, highlighting how it connects a result to financial considerations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

37%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Social Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "due to cost" is a versatile causal connector used to attribute actions and decisions to financial considerations. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in a wide range of contexts, from news reports and scientific papers to business communications. Its prevalence across various domains underscores its importance for articulating the financial reasons behind specific outcomes. While alternatives like "owing to cost" and "because of cost" exist, "due to cost" remains a frequently used and widely understood choice. When using this phrase, clarity is key: ensure that cost is unambiguously the cause being cited.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

owing to cost

This is a direct synonym, using 'owing to' instead of 'due to'.

because of cost

Replaces 'due to' with 'because of', a more informal alternative.

attributable to cost

Uses 'attributable to' to emphasize the cause.

on account of cost

Substitutes 'due to' with 'on account of', which is slightly more formal.

as a result of cost

Emphasizes the consequence of cost.

resulting from cost

Highlights the outcome of cost factors.

caused by cost

Directly states that cost is the cause.

stemming from cost

Implies that cost is the origin or source.

by reason of cost

A more formal and less common way of saying "due to cost".

in light of the cost

This alternative indicates consideration of cost implications.

FAQs

How can I use "due to cost" in a sentence?

You can use "due to cost" to explain why something happened or a decision was made because of financial reasons. For example, "The product's release was delayed "due to cost" overruns."

What can I say instead of "due to cost"?

You can use alternatives like "owing to cost", "because of cost", or "attributable to cost" depending on the context.

Is it more formal to say "owing to cost" or "due to cost"?

"Owing to cost" is generally considered slightly more formal than ""due to cost"", though both are acceptable in most formal writing.

What's the difference between "due to cost" and "for cost reasons"?

"Due to cost" emphasizes cost as the direct cause, while "for cost reasons" implies a broader consideration of financial factors influencing a decision. The phrases are often interchangeable.