Ai Feedback
Exact(12)
From the TG-DSC curves (Figure 7), the thermal decomposition of CuS can be divided into three major steps based on the DSC endotherm observed.
The first decomposition step is identified in the temperature range of 38.0 165.0°C°C in which a shallow broad DSC endotherm is detected.
The second decomposition step is found in the temperature range of 217.0 – 348.0°C in which a well-defined DSC endotherm is associated.
The third decomposition step is identified in the temperature range of 345.0 – 470.0°C in which a huge mass loss of the sample (≈ 12.0%) as well as the sharp DSC endotherm is observed.
The time-dependent development of a high temperature DSC endotherm and a high temperature tan δ relaxation were attributed to the dynamics of microphase separation of ionic aggregates.
The DSC (Differential Scaning Calorimetry) thermograms revealed a quite complex behavior in the temperature range 250 350 °C, where it was seen that with increase in fluence the DSC exotherm changed into the DSC endotherm.
Similar(48)
A relationship consistent with that established by the DSC endotherms was confirmed, as shown in Figure 4a.
Hscen1 and Hscen2 share similar curve shapes but different relative stabilities, in good agreement with both CD thermal dependence and the DSC endotherms, in which Hscen1 is more stable than Hscen2.
The quantitative estimate of the stability of these solvates is established by determining the binding energy [1, 14, 16] for the solvents in all the solvates using equation 1 where the percent mass loss measured over the TG desolvation step of each solvate (ΔmS%) was related to the enthalpy change calculated over the corresponding DSC desolvation endotherm (ΔHSexp).
As well as for the mechanical blend of the polymer with silica (Fig. 2), at heating of carbon nanotubes mixed with the polymer in the region near 223 °C on the DSC curve, the endotherm is detected (Fig. 4, curve 5), but in this case, the process is followed by the weight loss on the TGA curve (Fig. 3, curve 5).
This implies that the melting point of form II° is lower than that of form I, which melts at 231 °C with decomposition (second endotherm in DSC curve of Figure 4, overlapping with a broader endotherm, indicating the decomposition process).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com