does not eliminate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not eliminate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that does not remove or negate a particular issue, possibility, or condition. Example: "While the new policy improves efficiency, it does not eliminate the need for regular maintenance."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Denigrating it does not eliminate it.

The New York Times

"But shifting risk does not eliminate it.

The New York Times

It does not eliminate the prospects.

The New York Times - Sports

But embedding does not eliminate the risk.

The New York Times

The system does not eliminate all waiting.

The New York Times - Tech

It does not eliminate the toxic assets.

The New York Times

"This does not eliminate the playing field".

The New York Times

This approach does not eliminate opposition.

The New York Times - Magazine

An additional scrape flutter idler does not eliminate these vibrations.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

The problem is, not attacking does not eliminate the risks.

The New York Times

But it does not eliminate the charges against him.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "does not eliminate", clarify what the subject does achieve if it doesn't fully eliminate the issue. This provides a more balanced and informative statement.

Common error

Avoid using "does not eliminate" when a complete solution is achieved. Overstating the limitation can undermine the actual success of the action or policy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not eliminate" functions as a qualifier or a limiter, indicating that while some action may have a positive effect, it falls short of completely removing something. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Science

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "does not eliminate" is a versatile expression used to convey that something reduces or mitigates a condition or issue without fully removing it. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and widely used across diverse fields like news, science, and academia. When using this phrase, it's essential to provide context on what is achieved, or what residual effects remain to manage expectations effectively. While there are many possible near synonyms, always chose the one the best fits the context!

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not remove

A more literal substitution, focusing on the act of taking something away.

fails to eliminate

Highlights the lack of success in removing or eradicating something.

does not eradicate

Focuses on complete destruction or removal, often implying a more thorough process than simple elimination.

does not negate

Emphasizes that something is not made ineffective or invalid, rather than physically removed.

does not solve

Similar to "does not resolve", but often used in the context of problems with specific solutions.

does not prevent

Shifts the focus to the inability to stop something from happening, rather than removing something already present.

does not end

Similar to "does not halt", focusing on the persistence of a situation or condition.

does not resolve

Implies that a problem or conflict remains, even if attempts have been made to address it.

does not halt

Emphasizes the continuation of an action or process, rather than complete cessation.

does not avoid

Focuses on the inability to steer clear of something, highlighting inevitability.

FAQs

How can I use "does not eliminate" in a sentence?

Use "does not eliminate" to indicate that something reduces or mitigates an issue without completely removing it. For example, "This measure reduces the risk, but "does not eliminate" it entirely."

What are some alternatives to "does not eliminate"?

Alternatives include "does not remove", "does not negate", or "fails to eliminate" depending on the context and the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to say "does not eliminate" or "eliminates"?

The choice depends on the context. Use "eliminates" when something completely removes an issue. Use "does not eliminate" when something reduces an issue but doesn't fully resolve it.

What's the difference between "does not eliminate" and "reduces"?

"Reduces" implies a decrease in severity or quantity, while "does not eliminate" specifies that something is not completely removed. Something can reduce a problem without fully eliminating it; therefore, the choice depends on the desired level of precision.