does not remove

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not remove" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the effect or outcome of an action that fails to eliminate something. Example: "The new policy does not remove the existing regulations, but rather adds to them."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Spyware removal does not remove viruses.

WikiHow

Washing does not remove them.

The New York Times

But that does not remove the problem in principle.

Princeton University

It mitigates, but does not remove, the pain".

The New Yorker

Importantly, it does not remove all of it.

The New York Times

According to studies, vitamin E does not remove scars.

The New York Times - Health

Issuing contingent guarantees does not remove that risk.

The Economist

It does not remove, however, the need for S.E.C. action.

The New York Times

Qualifying for a communal plot does not remove your name from the waitlist for individual plots.

Stanford University

She said: "[Cuadrilla's announcement] does not remove the fact that this would be unconventional extraction.

The Guardian

Raking does not remove it completely; mowing seems to make it worse.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "does not remove", ensure the sentence clearly indicates what action fails to achieve removal and what remains as a result. This provides clarity and context for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "does not remove" when a partial removal or alteration occurs. Instead, use phrases like "partially removes" or "reduces" for greater accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not remove" primarily functions as a negative transitive verb phrase. It asserts that a specific action or process fails to eliminate something, as demonstrated in many examples provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

40%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "does not remove" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to convey the failure of an action or process to completely eliminate something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely used across diverse contexts, from news and media to scientific research and academic writing. While perfectly acceptable, other alternatives like "fails to eliminate" or "does not eliminate" could be used depending on context. Use "does not remove" when the intention is to highlight ineffectiveness and ensure you clearly specify the limitations of an action for clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not eliminate

A direct synonym, focusing on the lack of complete removal.

fails to eliminate

Emphasizes the failure to completely get rid of something.

does not get rid of

More informal, but conveys the same meaning of not discarding something.

is not effective at removing

Specifies ineffectiveness in the context of removal.

does not diminish

Indicates that something doesn't decrease or lessen in intensity.

does not eradicate

Stronger term, implying complete destruction or elimination, but still indicating a failure to do so.

does not negate

Highlights that something is not cancelled out or made ineffective.

does not alter

Highlights the lack of change or modification.

does not resolve

Focuses on the lack of solving a problem or issue.

does not alleviate

Focuses on not reducing pain or difficulty.

FAQs

How to use "does not remove" in a sentence?

Use "does not remove" to indicate that an action or process fails to completely eliminate something. For example, "Washing does not remove all bacteria from the surface".

What can I say instead of "does not remove"?

You can use alternatives like "fails to eliminate", "does not eliminate", or "does not get rid of" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "does not remove" or "doesn't remove"?

Both "does not remove" and "doesn't remove" are grammatically correct. "Doesn't remove" is a contraction of "does not remove" and is more informal.

What's the difference between "does not remove" and "prevents"?

"Does not remove" implies that something already exists and an attempt to eliminate it fails. "Prevents" indicates that something stops something from happening or existing in the first place. The phrases are not interchangeable.