does not disqualify

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not disqualify" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something does not eliminate or exclude someone or something from consideration or eligibility. Example: "Having a minor infraction on your record does not disqualify you from applying for the job."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

It is a blip that does not disqualify the model, these bankers insist.

The Economist

An exception is the United Church of Christ, which does not disqualify people for sexual preference.

The New York Times

Romney's history does not disqualify him from attacking Trump, who is, indeed, a dangerous candidate.

The New Yorker

Simply put, Sergio's undocumented status does not disqualify his admission to the bar for any kind of "moral fitness" objection.

The Guardian - Opinion

Since the 22nd does not disqualify him to be president, the 12th Amendment would not disqualify him to be, or to be elected as, vice president.

The New York Times

In most civilian courts, the judge does not disqualify two out of the three defense lawyers as a trial is about to start.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

24 human-written examples

This doesn't disqualify them, of course.

The New York Times

But the no-Hollywood stipulation doesn't disqualify the western.

The New York Times

That doesn't disqualify it from being good.

The New York Times - Arts

Being married to the person you're caring for doesn't disqualify you.

Independent

Just because it is a psychedelic doesn't disqualify it in our eyes".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "does not disqualify", ensure the context clearly defines what potential cause is being considered and what outcome it doesn't prevent. This adds clarity and prevents misinterpretation.

Common error

Avoid assuming that because one factor "does not disqualify" someone or something, all potential issues are resolved. It only addresses the specific factor mentioned; other disqualifying factors may still exist.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not disqualify" functions as a predicate in a sentence, specifically indicating that a particular condition or attribute is not sufficient to cause someone or something to be deemed ineligible or unfit for a specific purpose or role. Ludwig AI affirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Science

42%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "does not disqualify" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate that a specific factor isn't sufficient to invalidate or exclude something, according to Ludwig. Predominantly found in News & Media and Science contexts, it serves to provide assurance or clarification. While similar phrases exist, "does not preclude" and "does not invalidate" provide close alternatives. When using this phrase, ensure the context is explicit about what is not causing disqualification, and don't assume that resolving one factor eliminates all potential issues.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not preclude

Replaces "disqualify" with "preclude", indicating prevention rather than invalidation.

does not invalidate

Substitutes "disqualify" with "invalidate", suggesting the subject remains valid despite a potential issue.

does not rule out

Replaces "disqualify" with "rule out", focusing on not eliminating a possibility.

is not a bar to

Uses a more formal tone, indicating that something is not an obstacle.

does not negate

Replaces "disqualify" with "negate", meaning it does not cancel something out.

does not preclude from

Replaces "disqualify" with "preclude from", focusing on the prevention of someone from doing something.

is not grounds for

Indicates that something is not a sufficient reason for a particular action or decision.

does not hinder

Replaces "disqualify" with "hinder", suggesting it doesn't impede or obstruct something.

does not impede

Similar to "does not hinder", but with a slightly more formal tone.

is not sufficient to

Indicates that something is not adequate to cause a specific outcome.

FAQs

How can I use "does not disqualify" in a sentence?

Use "does not disqualify" to indicate that a particular factor isn't sufficient to invalidate or exclude something. For example: "A previous illness "does not disqualify" you from participating in the study".

What phrases are similar to "does not disqualify"?

Similar phrases include "does not preclude", "does not invalidate", and "does not rule out", all suggesting that something isn't an absolute barrier.

When is it appropriate to use "does not disqualify" in formal writing?

It is appropriate in formal writing when discussing eligibility, conditions, or criteria. It's useful in legal documents, academic papers, and professional reports to clarify that a specific condition doesn't automatically cause exclusion.

What's the difference between "does not disqualify" and "does not exclude"?

While both are similar, ""does not disqualify"" often implies a formal set of rules or criteria, whereas "does not exclude" can be used in broader contexts. Disqualification often relates to specific qualifications, while exclusion can be more general.