does not invalidate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not invalidate" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when stating that something does not nullify or make something else invalid or ineffective. Example: "The new evidence does not invalidate the original findings of the study."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This does not invalidate Mr. Simmons's arguments.

The New York Times

This does not invalidate the experiment.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

That the details have changed does not invalidate his accomplishment.

The New York Times

But this does not invalidate reincarnation as a possibility.

The New York Times - Books

The bill does not invalidate the agreement, merely postpones it.

The New York Times

Even if she did, that does NOT invalidate her 60 years of science-backed work.

Harvard University

that Pearce does not invalidate the conviction that resulted from Rice's second trial.

Cornell University

But it does not invalidate the rest of a consistently instructive canter across fascinating country.

The Economist

Explaining why you are violating the Fourth Amendment does not invalidate the Fourth Amendment.

The Guardian - Opinion

However, this does not invalidate our main conclusion that the two techniques give comparable results.

Nature

Action at one level does not invalidate our commitment to work at the other levels.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "does not invalidate", ensure that the context clearly establishes what is being protected from being nullified. For instance, specify what conclusion, argument, or result remains valid despite a limitation or challenge.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "does not invalidate" implies complete agreement or acceptance. It merely signifies that a specific aspect remains valid, not that all concerns are resolved. Clarify the specific scope of what remains valid.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not invalidate" functions as a predicate in a sentence, asserting that something does not nullify or negate another element. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. Examples from Ludwig illustrate its use in academic and scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

36%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "does not invalidate" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that serves to affirm the continuing validity of a statement or finding. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is suitable for use in English writing. Its usage is especially common within scientific, academic, and news-related contexts, where it serves to counter potential criticisms or affirm the robustness of conclusions. Although alternatives such as "doesn't negate" or "doesn't nullify" exist, "does not invalidate" provides a clear and widely understood way to maintain the credibility of information in the face of challenges.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

doesn't negate

Replaces "invalidate" with "negate", focusing on the lack of nullification.

doesn't nullify

Substitutes "invalidate" with "nullify", emphasizing the absence of rendering something void.

doesn't undermine

Replaces "invalidate" with "undermine", suggesting a failure to weaken or diminish.

doesn't discredit

Uses "discredit" instead of "invalidate", highlighting the lack of damage to credibility.

doesn't negate the effect of

Adds "the effect of" to clarify that the impact remains.

doesn't render void

Replaces "invalidate" with "render void", emphasizing the lack of legal or formal cancellation.

doesn't diminish

Substitutes "invalidate" with "diminish", indicating that something's value or importance is not lessened.

is still valid despite

Restructures the sentence to emphasize ongoing validity.

doesn't overturn

Replaces "invalidate" with "overturn", emphasizing the lack of reversal of a decision or result.

remains unaffected

Shifts focus to the lack of impact or change.

FAQs

How can I use "does not invalidate" in a sentence?

Use "does not invalidate" to state that something doesn't make another thing untrue or worthless, even if there's a challenge or limitation. For example, "The small sample size "does not invalidate" the study's findings, but it suggests the need for further research."

What's a more formal alternative to "does not invalidate"?

In more formal writing, consider using alternatives such as "does not nullify", "does not negate", or "does not render void".

Is it better to use "does not invalidate" or "doesn't invalidate"?

"Does not invalidate" is more formal and suitable for academic or professional writing, while "doesn't invalidate" is a contraction and is more appropriate for informal contexts. Both are grammatically correct.

What's the nuance between "does not invalidate" and "does not weaken"?

"Does not invalidate" means something remains essentially true or valid, whereas "does not weaken" implies that something's impact or strength is not diminished. "Does not invalidate" is stronger, suggesting the core validity is intact. In contrast, "does not weaken" allows for some impact but not a significant reduction.