dismissed by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "dismissed by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that someone or something was dismissed or rejected by another person. For example, "He was quickly dismissed by his employer when it was discovered he had been embezzling funds."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Most were dismissed by judges or withdrawn.

The New York Times

Her theory was widely dismissed by Ripperologists.

The Guardian

Claims of bullying were dismissed by Swann.

The Guardian - Sport

Both were eventually dismissed by Jack Taylor.

The Guardian - Sport

Such accounts are dismissed by Assad supporters.

The Guardian

The overture was dismissed by the Israelis.

The New York Times

Both were dismissed by them as "middlebrow".

The New Yorker

This is a view dismissed by local politicians.

Independent

The elections were dismissed by opposition figures as a sham.

The New York Times

That suggestion was dismissed by campaign advisers to rival candidates.

The New York Times

The Dutchman was dismissed by Spurs last October.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "dismissed by" when you want to convey that a person or group rejected or disregarded an idea, claim, or another person, often implying a lack of serious consideration.

Common error

Ensure the subject performing the dismissing action is clearly identified. Vague sentence structures can lead to confusion about who is doing the dismissing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "dismissed by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that someone or something was the recipient of a dismissal. This means that the subject received the action of being disregarded or rejected by someone else. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

20%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "dismissed by" is a common and grammatically sound way to express that something or someone has been rejected or disregarded, often implying a lack of thorough consideration. It enjoys widespread usage in news, science, encyclopedias, and wiki sources, as confirmed by Ludwig. When using this phrase, ensure that the subject performing the dismissal is clear to avoid ambiguity. For alternatives, consider options like "rejected by" or "refuted by", tailoring your choice to the specific context. Ludwig AI supports its use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rejected by

Expresses a strong form of disapproval or refusal, similar to "dismissed by" but potentially more forceful.

refuted by

Implies that something has been proven false or incorrect by evidence or argument, focusing on the invalidation aspect.

disregarded by

Suggests that something has been ignored or overlooked, emphasizing the lack of attention or consideration.

overruled by

Often used in legal or formal contexts to indicate that a decision or ruling has been reversed or set aside by a higher authority.

denied by

Indicates a statement or request was refused by someone in a position of authority.

invalidated by

Signifies that something has been proven to be without legal or factual basis.

shot down by

An informal expression suggesting that an idea or proposal was quickly and decisively rejected.

brushed aside by

Implies a casual or dismissive rejection, suggesting that something was treated as unimportant.

scoffed at by

Indicates that something was mocked or ridiculed, emphasizing the contemptuous nature of the rejection.

written off by

Suggests that something has been considered a failure or loss and is no longer worth considering.

FAQs

How can I use "dismissed by" in a sentence?

The phrase "dismissed by" is used to indicate that someone or something has been rejected or disregarded. For example, "The proposal was "dismissed by" the committee after a brief discussion".

What are some alternatives to "dismissed by"?

Alternatives include "rejected by", "refuted by", or "disregarded by". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it always negative to say something was "dismissed by" someone?

Yes, using the phrase "dismissed by" generally carries a negative connotation, implying that something was rejected or treated as unimportant, often without due consideration.

What's the difference between "dismissed by" and "rejected by"?

"Dismissed by" suggests a more casual or peremptory rejection, whereas "rejected by" implies a more formal or considered refusal. It highlights that something was considered unsuitable or unacceptable.