dismiss by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "dismiss by" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express the act of rejecting or disregarding something, but it lacks proper context or structure. Example: "The committee decided to dismiss by the proposal due to its lack of feasibility."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

They are hard to dismiss by any but the wilfully dim-sighted.

The Economist

The judge, Naomi R. Buchwald, said she would rule on the motion to dismiss by March 31.

The New York Times - Food

The judicial system has been completely undermined by Marcos's control over the tenure of all judges whom he can dismiss by Presidential decree or by appointing replacements.

The New Yorker

Some of the other lawsuits have survived motions to dismiss by the gun industry and have quietly moved into the discovery phase.

The New York Times

The judge also rejected a separate motion to dismiss by AT&T, which had argued that its relationship with the government made it immune from prosecution.

The New York Times

But the report's authoritative conclusion that "the United States engaged in the practice of torture" is impossible to dismiss by a public that needs to know what was committed in the nation's name.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Today, they were dismissed by phone.

Independent

Most were dismissed by judges or withdrawn.

The New York Times

Both were eventually dismissed by Jack Taylor.

The Guardian - Sport

Earlier this week, Mr. Clemente was dismissed by Mr. Shine.

The New York Times

Her theory was widely dismissed by Ripperologists.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "dismiss by" in formal writing. Instead, use more grammatically correct alternatives like "rejected by" or "overruled by". This ensures clarity and avoids misinterpretation.

Common error

The phrase "dismiss by" often results from confusion with correct phrases like "dismissed by". Ensure you're using the correct past participle form and preposition. For example, "The case was dismissed by the judge", not "The judge decided to "dismiss by" the case".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "dismiss by" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not standard in written English. It seems intended to express rejection or disregard but lacks proper grammatical structure.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

14%

Encyclopedias

14%

Science

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "dismiss by" is grammatically incorrect and not recommended for use in formal writing. Ludwig AI confirms its non-standard nature. While some examples exist, they often represent misuses of the intended phrase "dismissed by". Instead, consider using grammatically correct alternatives like "rejected by", "overruled by", or "denied by" to ensure clarity and avoid misinterpretation. Although the provided examples come from authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian, the incorrect grammar overshadows the source authority, making it crucial to opt for proper phrasing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reject by

Replaces "dismiss" with "reject", focusing on the act of refusal or non-acceptance by someone.

overrule by

Suggests a higher authority reversing a decision made by someone.

nullify by

Emphasizes the act of making something void or ineffective by an authority.

set aside by

Indicates that a decision or judgment has been canceled or reversed by someone.

rescind by

Highlights the cancellation or revocation of a law, order, or agreement by a specific entity.

repeal by

Specifically refers to the act of revoking or annulling a law or act of parliament by a legislative body.

countermand by

Suggests the reversal of an order by someone with superior authority.

invalidate by

Focuses on making something legally or officially null and void by an authority.

voided by

Implies that something has been declared null and without legal force or effect by a person or entity.

annul by

Indicates the declaration that something is invalid, especially a marriage, contract, or law, by a recognized authority.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "dismiss" with a preposition?

Use "dismissed by" to indicate who or what is doing the dismissing. For example, "The claim was "dismissed by" the court" is correct.

What's a better way to phrase "dismiss by"?

Instead of "dismiss by", consider using phrases like "rejected by", "overruled by", or "denied by" for clarity and grammatical correctness.

Is "dismiss by" grammatically correct?

No, "dismiss by" is not grammatically correct. The correct phrasing is typically "dismissed by" or using an alternative verb like "reject" or "overrule" with the preposition "by".

What does "dismiss by" incorrectly suggest?

Because "dismiss by" is grammatically incorrect, it may not clearly convey the intended meaning. It's often misinterpreted as an incomplete or misused form of "dismissed by", leading to confusion. Using correct alternatives ensures your message is clear.