disagreements with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "disagreements with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing differing opinions or conflicts between individuals or groups. Example: "There were several disagreements with the proposed policy changes during the meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Disagreements with mentors are inevitable.

The New York Times

Details Lakoff's disagreements with Chomsky.

University of California, Berkeley

Readers can have editorial disagreements with newspapers.

The New York Times

Rumours of disagreements with Castro grew.

The Guardian

Did he have disagreements with Balls?

The Guardian

I had no disagreements with John Kerry.

The New Yorker

"Carl Bass had disagreements with Duncan; Enron had disagreements with Bass.

The New York Times

There were disagreements with him over the situation.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Waldrop resigned this post over disagreements with the board.

The New York Times - Arts

Honda recognizes it has disagreements with other producers.

The New York Times

As for Boyd's disagreements with the Fleming estate?

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "disagreements with", specify the area or topic of disagreement for clarity.

Common error

Avoid vague references. State clearly what the disagreements pertain to, otherwise your writing risks being confusing. For example, specify "disagreements with the budget proposal" instead of just "disagreements with the team".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "disagreements with" functions as a prepositional phrase, often used to indicate a point of contention or differing opinions between individuals, groups, or entities. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Academia

18%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Science

7%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "disagreements with" is a common and grammatically correct way to express differing opinions or conflicts. Ludwig AI validates its correct usage in a wide variety of contexts, particularly in news, academic writing, and general discourse. While alternatives such as "conflicts with" or "differences with" exist, the choice depends on the desired nuance and level of formality. For clarity, always specify the subject of the "disagreements" to avoid ambiguity, ultimately improving written communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

conflicts with

Replaces "disagreements" with a more direct term indicating opposition.

discord with

Substitutes "disagreements" with a term suggesting a lack of harmony.

differences with

Uses a more neutral term than "disagreements", emphasizing variations in opinion.

arguments with

Replaces "disagreements" with a term suggesting a more heated exchange.

clashes with

Uses a more forceful term to describe the conflicts.

friction with

Suggests a tension or strain in the relationship due to differing views.

contention with

Implies a more formal or legalistic disagreement.

opposition to

Focuses on the act of being against something, rather than the disagreement itself.

dissent from

Highlights the act of holding a different opinion, especially from an official stance.

at odds with

Suggests a fundamental incompatibility or conflict in opinions.

FAQs

How can I use "disagreements with" in a sentence?

You can use "disagreements with" to indicate differing opinions or conflicts, as in, "The manager had several "disagreements with" the project's direction".

What are some alternatives to "disagreements with"?

Alternatives include "conflicts with", "differences with", or "clashes with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more formal to say "disagreements with" or "conflicts with"?

"Disagreements with" is generally considered more neutral, while "conflicts with" implies a more serious or intense level of discord.

Can "disagreements with" refer to abstract concepts, or only people?

"Disagreements with" can apply to both. You can have "disagreements with" a person's opinion or "disagreements with" a specific policy.