clashes with

USAGE SUMMARY

"clash with" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe two or more ideas, people, events, etc. that are incompatible or in conflict. For example: "Her opinion clashes with the rest of the group's."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I've had my clashes with Mr. Lynch.

The New York Times

Clashes with the other lot's conference.

The Economist

Clashes with Mongols were nearly incessant.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Aggressive dissonance clashes with traditional tonal underpinnings.

The New York Times - Arts

Scientific progress brought inevitable clashes with scripture.

The Guardian

Blake clashes with Mary from the start.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

That leads to clashes with Campbell".

The New York Times

Emotional turmoil clashes with gorgeous seaside visuals.

The Guardian - Film

Violent clashes with Israeli settlers add to the burden.

The New York Times

Wexler was also noted for his clashes with directors.

Independent

It could result in potential clashes with Russians".

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "clashes with" to clearly indicate direct opposition or incompatibility between ideas, groups, or entities. It's stronger than simply "differs from".

Common error

Avoid using "clashes with" for minor disagreements or preferences. Reserve it for significant points of conflict or incompatibility to maintain its impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "clashes with" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, often used to indicate a direct conflict or incompatibility between two or more entities, ideas, or forces. As Ludwig AI suggests, it denotes a strong disagreement.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Encyclopedias

12%

Science

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "clashes with" is a commonly used prepositional phrase that effectively conveys a strong sense of conflict or incompatibility. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, highlighting its role in indicating direct opposition. Predominantly found in news and media contexts, it serves to emphasize points of contention, maintaining a neutral register suitable for various forms of discourse. When a more formal tone is required, alternatives like ""conflicts with"" may be preferred.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

conflicts with

Indicates a fundamental incompatibility or opposition.

confrontations with

Highlights direct and often heated encounters.

standoffs with

Suggests a more prolonged or strategic disagreement.

hostilities with

Emphasizes open animosity and conflict.

tangles with

Implies a more complex and potentially messy conflict.

fighting with

Refers to physical or verbal combat.

shootouts with

Specifically refers to armed conflicts or intense exchanges.

disagreements with

A general term for differing opinions or viewpoints.

difficulties with

A milder way to express problems or disagreements.

struggles with

Focuses on the effort and difficulty in overcoming opposition.

FAQs

How can I use "clashes with" in a sentence?

Use "clashes with" to indicate a strong disagreement or conflict between two or more things. For example, "His opinion "clashes with" the company's policy".

What are some alternatives to "clashes with"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "conflicts with", "opposes", or "contradicts" as alternatives to "clashes with".

Is "clashes with" formal or informal?

"Clashes with" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. However, in very formal writing, you might consider using "conflicts with" for a slightly more elevated tone.

What's the difference between "clashes with" and "differs from"?

"Clashes with" indicates a stronger, more direct conflict or incompatibility, while "differs from" simply means that two things are not the same without necessarily implying conflict.