difficult to disagree

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "difficult to disagree" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when expressing that a statement or opinion is so compelling or convincing that it is hard for someone to find a counterargument. Example: "The evidence presented was so strong that it was difficult to disagree with the conclusion drawn by the researchers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Difficult to disagree.

The Guardian - Travel

Difficult to disagree with the experts.

The Guardian

I found it difficult to disagree with him.

The New York Times - Magazine

It is difficult to disagree with his finding.

The Economist

Sentiments it is, in general, difficult to disagree with.

The Guardian - Opinion

James thinks he's a psychopath, and it's difficult to disagree.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Realistically, I find that notion difficult to disagree with.

The New York Times

It's the sort of "white heat of technology" statement with which it is difficult to disagree.

The Guardian

Difficult to disagree (although I'd be sad to see the back of the PMQs live blog).

The Guardian

And in my opinion it's difficult to disagree with much of what he says.

The Guardian - Sport

Watching the variation and vision involved in his four goals against the Canaries, it is difficult to disagree.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider your audience and the context; "difficult to disagree" works well in both formal and informal settings, but choose synonyms like "hard to argue with" or "compellingly logical" for specific nuances.

Common error

Avoid using "difficult to disagree" when expressing purely subjective opinions. This phrase is most effective when the statement is supported by evidence or logic, not simply personal preference.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "difficult to disagree" functions as an adjective phrase followed by an infinitive. It modifies a statement or idea, indicating that it is so compelling or well-supported that it resists opposition. Ludwig AI's examples showcase it as a descriptor of findings, opinions, and conclusions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

84%

Academia

9%

Science

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "difficult to disagree" is a versatile and frequently used expression to indicate that a statement or idea is compelling, logical, and well-supported. It functions as an adjective phrase and infinitive and serves to express strong agreement. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and appropriate for various contexts, especially within news media and academia. While it's suitable for formal writing, avoid overuse in purely subjective contexts. Alternatives like "hard to argue with" or "compellingly logical" can provide nuanced variations. Its frequent appearance in authoritative sources like The Guardian and The New York Times underscores its legitimacy and widespread acceptance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

hard to argue with

Emphasizes the challenge in presenting a counterargument.

scarcely deniable

Highlights the near impossibility of denying the statement's truth.

virtually impossible to refute

Focuses on the strength of the evidence making it unassailable.

compellingly logical

Stresses the persuasive nature of the reasoning.

undeniably true

Asserts the statement's truth with certainty.

substantially unarguable

Highlights a lack of room for disagreement.

not easily contested

Suggests resistance to challenge or dispute.

challenging to refute

Indicates a difficultly in disproving the statement.

convincingly accurate

Emphasizes the accuracy and persuasiveness of the information.

patently obvious

Stresses the self-evident nature of the statement.

FAQs

How can I use "difficult to disagree" in a sentence?

You can use "difficult to disagree" to indicate that a statement is well-supported or logically sound, making it unlikely to be challenged. For example, "Given the overwhelming evidence, it's "difficult to disagree" with the report's findings".

What are some alternatives to "difficult to disagree"?

Alternatives include "hard to argue with", "compellingly logical", or "undeniably true". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "difficult to disagree" in formal writing?

Yes, "difficult to disagree" is suitable for formal writing. It is a clear and professional way to express that a statement is well-supported. If you want a more formal tone, consider alternatives like "virtually impossible to refute".

What's the difference between "difficult to disagree" and "hard to believe"?

"Difficult to disagree" suggests that a statement is logically sound and well-supported, making it challenging to find a counterargument. "Hard to believe", on the other hand, implies that a statement is surprising or improbable, even if it might be true.