hard to argue with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "hard to argue with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to express that a statement or opinion is compelling or difficult to dispute. Example: "Her evidence was so strong that it was hard to argue with her conclusion."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It's hard to argue with.

The New York Times

Hard to argue with that.

The New York Times

Very hard to argue with.

The New York Times

That's hard to argue with.

The New Yorker

It was hard to argue with.

The New Yorker

It's hard to argue with documentation".

The New Yorker

It's hard to argue with this.

The New Yorker

This is hard to argue with.

The Economist

These are objectives hard to argue with.

The New York Times

It is hard to argue with him.

The New York Times

But success is hard to argue with.

The New York Times - Food

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "hard to argue with" when you want to acknowledge the validity of a point, even if you personally disagree with it. This shows respect for differing viewpoints and promotes constructive discussion.

Common error

Avoid using "hard to argue with" too frequently in your writing, as it can become repetitive. Vary your language by using synonyms like "indisputable" or "compelling" to maintain reader engagement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "hard to argue with" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun. It expresses that something is very difficult to dispute or challenge. Ludwig AI shows several examples in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

88%

Formal & Business

7%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "hard to argue with" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to express that something is difficult to dispute. Ludwig AI's analysis shows its widespread use in news, media, and formal contexts. While versatile, it's important to avoid overuse and consider synonyms like "indisputable" or "compelling" for variety. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase effectively concedes a point or acknowledges validity, making it a valuable tool in both writing and conversation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

difficult to dispute

Focuses on the challenge of disproving the statement.

indisputable

Highlights the irrefutable nature of the statement.

unassailable

Emphasizes the strength and invulnerability of the argument.

irrefutable

Stresses the impossibility of refuting the claim.

beyond question

Indicates that the statement is so clear it shouldn't be questioned.

undeniable

Highlights that the statement's truth is self-evident.

impossible to contradict

Focuses on the lack of opposing evidence or logic.

compelling

Highlights the strength and persuasiveness of the statement.

convincing

Emphasizes the ability of the statement to persuade others.

uncontestable

Emphasizes that the statement cannot be disputed successfully.

FAQs

How can I use "hard to argue with" in a sentence?

You can use "hard to argue with" to indicate that a statement or fact is difficult to dispute. For example: "The data clearly supports their claim, making it "hard to argue with"."

What are some alternatives to "hard to argue with"?

Alternatives include "difficult to dispute", "indisputable", or "unassailable". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more formal to say "difficult to dispute" than "hard to argue with"?

Yes, "difficult to dispute" is generally considered more formal than "hard to argue with". While both are acceptable, "difficult to dispute" is often preferred in academic or professional writing.

When is it appropriate to use "hard to argue with"?

Use "hard to argue with" when you want to acknowledge the strength of an argument or the validity of a point, even if you don't fully agree with it. It's suitable in various contexts, from informal discussions to more formal debates.