did not supply

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not supply" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something was not provided or given, often in a formal or professional context. Example: "The report indicated that the company did not supply the necessary documentation for the audit."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Khan did not supply it.

The Guardian

"I did not supply her with drugs.

The Guardian

She did not supply names or details.

The Guardian

"We did not supply arms," she said by telephone.

The New York Times

Kirin or other beer did not supply the headbands, nor Perrier the water.

The New Yorker

Dodge, however, did not supply any Chargers to the show's producers.

The New York Times

The remaining 54 samples did not supply any new evidence for a criminal prosecution, she said.

The New York Times

Notably, it did not supply historical figures for that metric, preventing outsiders from tracking its performance.

The New York Times

They did not supply images of her with the knife when asked.

The Guardian

"The campaign did not supply a reason for 65.8percentt of people to vote".

The New York Times

(Kirchmeier's office did not supply evidence of either claim, and no arrests were made).

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "did not supply" when you want to clearly state that something was not provided, especially when there was an expectation or requirement for it to be furnished. This phrase works well in formal reports, news articles, and academic writing.

Common error

While "did not supply" is grammatically correct, it can sound overly formal in casual conversation or informal writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "didn't give" or "didn't provide" in less formal settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not supply" functions as a verb phrase indicating the absence of provision or furnishing. It is typically used to state that someone or something failed to provide a particular item, service, or information. Ludwig AI shows that this phrase is acceptable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

28%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "did not supply" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression to denote a lack of provision. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. While versatile, it leans towards formal contexts, making it suitable for news, reports, and academic writing. Related phrases include "failed to provide" and "did not furnish", offering nuanced alternatives. Keep in mind that simpler phrases may be better suited for informal contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

failed to provide

Emphasizes a failure or inability to furnish the required item.

did not furnish

A more formal way of saying "did not supply", often used in official contexts.

did not offer

Focuses on the act of offering, implying a lack of willingness or opportunity.

withheld

Suggests a deliberate holding back of something that was expected or requested.

did not grant

Implies a refusal to give something that was requested or deserved.

did not contribute

Focuses on a lack of contribution to a shared resource or effort.

did not allocate

Specifically refers to a lack of assigning or distributing resources.

did not deliver

Highlights a failure to meet an obligation to provide something.

left unsupplied

Passive form, emphasizing the state of being without provision.

did not equip

Specifies a lack of providing necessary equipment or resources.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "did not supply"?

Alternatives include "failed to provide", "did not furnish", or "did not offer" depending on the context.

Is "did not supply" formal or informal?

"Did not supply" leans towards formal usage. Simpler phrases like "didn't give" or "didn't provide" are better suited for informal situations.

How can I use "did not supply" in a sentence?

Example: "The investigation revealed that the contractor "did not supply" the required safety equipment."

What is the difference between "did not supply" and "did not provide"?

While similar, "did not supply" often implies a more formal or official context compared to "did not provide".